Given the recurrence relation for the Fibonacci numbers, $F_{n+1}=F_{n}+F_{n-1}$ with $F_0=1$ and $F_1=1$ it's obvious that $F_n$ is a positive integer for all $n$. Suppose instead we were given $$F_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} \left(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n-\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} \left(\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^n$$ Without spotting that $F_{n+1}=F_{n}+F_{n-1}$, how might one show that $F_n$ is an integer for all $n$?
-
3I'm pretty certain that the fibbonacci sequence is given by: $F_{n+1}=F_{n} + F_{n-1}$ – Brad S. Mar 25 '14 at 21:18
-
^Thanks edited. – JackFielding Mar 25 '14 at 21:21
-
At least you can see it's rational by using binomial theorem for both terms and noticing that the even terms cancel and then the denominator cancels the square root. – ploosu2 Mar 25 '14 at 21:27
-
2Already answered: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/672212/how-to-prove-that-fibonacci-number-is-integer. – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla Mar 25 '14 at 22:34
2 Answers
A few ideas.
1: It's natural to multiply the right-hand side by $1=(1+\sqrt5)/2+(1-\sqrt5)2$ and see what happens. In this case, it turns the expression for $F_n$ into the expression for $F_{n+1}-F_{n-1}$, which you might not like for these purposes - but it does allow one to show that $F_{n+1}$ is an integer, by induction.
2: As ploosu2 mentioned, expanding everything using the binomial theorem shows that $F_n$ is rational; moreover, the only prime that can divide its denominator is $2$. So a careful analysis of the powers of $2$ dividing everything might succeed.
3: The expression is invariant under changing $\sqrt5$ to $-\sqrt5$. So Galois theory tells us that it's rational at least. In fact, everything in sight is an algebraic integer except the $1/\sqrt5$; so at worst the denominator is $5$. A more careful analysis might find a way to get rid of that $5$.
Combine 2 and 3 if you want, for that matter....
- 78,820
-
1When you're at 3., use $$\frac{\varphi^n - \psi^n}{\varphi-\psi} = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \varphi^{n-1-k}\psi^k$$ to see that $F_n$ is an algebraic integer. – Daniel Fischer Mar 25 '14 at 22:42
Without spotting initially the recurrence formula but knowing the theory of recurrence relations:
Because has the form $A\alpha^n+B\beta^n$, is obviously solution of a recurrence equation with characteristic polynomial $(x-\alpha)(y-\beta)=x^2-x-1$ in this case. This gives the recurrence relation.
- 41,546
- 4
- 46
- 89