I am writing this answer to address a misconception you seem to have.
First, let us generate a general formula for your surface of revolution. The idea is to rotate the shifted catenary $y=k+\cosh x$ over the $x$-axis, with the shift $k$ determining the appearance of the surface of revolution:
catrev[k_, {x_, θ_}] := {x, (k + Cosh[x]) Cos[θ], (k + Cosh[x]) Sin[θ]}
In particular, the cigar-shaped surface you imply in the OP corresponds to the value k = -Cosh[1]:
ParametricPlot3D[catrev[-Cosh[1], {x, θ}], {x, -1, 1}, {θ, 0, 2 π}]

Let us determine the surface area and volume of a generalization of these "cigars", by first letting $k=-\cosh h$.
(* surface area *)
Assuming[h > 0,
RegionMeasure[{x, (Cosh[x] - Cosh[h]) Cos[θ], (Cosh[x] - Cosh[h]) Sin[θ]},
{{x, -h, h}, {θ, 0, 2 π}}]]
π (-2 h + Sinh[2 h])
(* volume *)
Assuming[h > 0,
Volume[{x, c (Cosh[x] - Cosh[h]) Cos[θ], c (Cosh[x] - Cosh[h]) Sin[θ]},
{c, 0, 1}, {x, -h, h}, {θ, 0, 2 π}]]
π (2 h + h Cosh[2 h] - 3 Cosh[h] Sinh[h])
I think there is an interesting relation between the surface area and volume...
I'm not seeing a particularly simple one, myself.
Now, for your misconception. A minimal surface is a very specific concept in differential geometry; it refers to a surface with zero mean curvature. Qualitatively speaking, minimal surfaces will be either flat like the plane, or concave almost everywhere. Your proposed cigars fit neither of these appearances.
More concretely, let's determine the mean curvature of the surface of revolution constructed above:
MeanCurvature[f_?VectorQ, {u_, v_}] :=
Simplify[(Det[{D[f, {u, 2}], D[f, u], D[f, v]}] D[f, v].D[f, v] -
2 Det[{D[f, u, v], D[f, u], D[f, v]}] D[f, u].D[f, v] +
Det[{D[f, {v, 2}], D[f, u], D[f, v]}] D[f, u].D[f, u])/
(2 PowerExpand[Simplify[(D[f, u].D[f, u] D[f, v].D[f, v] -
(D[f, u].D[f, v])^2)]^(3/2)])]
(definition taken from here)
With that,
MeanCurvature[catrev[k, {x, θ}], {x, θ}]
-((k Sech[x]^2)/(2 (k + Cosh[x])))
and it is clear that this can only be zero if k == 0, which is exactly the catenoid case.