2

Consider the following Laplace equation and boundary condition $$\begin{equation}\begin{cases} \Delta \theta(r,\phi)=0 \\ \int d \vec{\ell}\cdot\nabla \theta(r,\phi)=2\pi \end{cases} \end{equation}$$ where $\phi\in[0,2\pi)$, $r\in[0,\infty)$ and the integral is over a circular contour of constant $r$ around the origin such that $d\vec{\ell}=rd\phi \hat{\phi}$ with $\hat{\phi}$ a unit vector in direction $\phi$. The solution to this equation is simply $\theta(r,\phi)=\phi$.

I want to learn how to solve this equation numerically in Mathematica and (approximately) recreate the solution in Cartesian coordinates. To this end, I'm taking a cylindrical domain with an annulus to avoid problems at $r=0$. The outer radius is $R_{1}=1$ and the inner radius is $R_{0}=0.1$. The domain looks like this

enter image description here

Following Solve Laplace equation in Cylindrical - Polar Coordinates, I seem to get the correct solution in polar coordinates but not in Cartesian coordinates and I don't understand why.

Any help is appreciated.

In Polar coordinates I get

enter image description here

and in Cartesian coordinates I get

enter image description here

This is the code in polar coordinates

R1 = 1; R0 = 0.1;
regionCyl = 
  DiscretizeRegion[
   RegionDifference[
    ImplicitRegion[
     0 <= r <= R1 && 0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi], {r, \[Phi]}], 
    ImplicitRegion[
     0 <= r <= R0 && 0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi], {r, \[Phi]}]], 
   PrecisionGoal -> 6];
laplacianCil = Laplacian[\[Theta][r, \[Phi]], {r, \[Phi]}, "Polar"];
boundaryConditionCil = {DirichletCondition[\[Theta][
      r, \[Phi]] == \[Phi], {r == R0, 0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi]}], 
   DirichletCondition[\[Theta][r, \[Phi]] == \[Phi], {r == R1, 
     0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi]}]};
solCyl = NDSolveValue[{laplacianCil == 0, 
    boundaryConditionCil}, \[Theta], {r, \[Phi]} \[Element] regionCyl,
    MaxSteps -> Infinity];
potentialSquareRepresentation = 
  ContourPlot[
   solCyl[r, \[Phi]], {r, \[Phi]} \[Element] solCyl["ElementMesh"], 
   ColorFunction -> "Temperature", Contours -> 20, 
   PlotLegends -> Automatic];
potentialCylindricalRepresentation = 
 Show[potentialSquareRepresentation /. 
   GraphicsComplex[array1_, rest___] :> 
    GraphicsComplex[(#[[1]] {Cos[#[[2]]], Sin[#[[2]]]}) & /@ array1, 
     rest], PlotRange -> Automatic]

and this is the code in Cartesian coordinates

R1 = 1; R0 = 0.1;
regionCyl = 
  DiscretizeRegion[
   RegionDifference[ImplicitRegion[Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= R1, {x, y}], 
    ImplicitRegion[Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= R0, {x, y}]], 
   PrecisionGoal -> 7];
laplacian = Laplacian[\[Theta][x, y], {x, y}];
boundaryCondition = {DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] == 
     ArcSin[y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]], {Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] == R0, 
     0 <= y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= 2 \[Pi]}], 
   DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] == 
     ArcSin[y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]], {Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] == R1, 
     0 <= y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= 2 \[Pi]}]};
sol = NDSolveValue[{laplacian == 0, 
    boundaryCondition}, \[Theta], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl, 
   MaxSteps -> Infinity];
DensityPlot[sol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl, 
 ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", PlotLegends -> Automatic, 
 ImageSize -> Medium]
J. M.'s missing motivation
  • 124,525
  • 11
  • 401
  • 574
Asaf Miron
  • 347
  • 1
  • 9
  • 1
    It's not about the solution NDSolveValue being incorrect (I haven't checked but it lookes plausible to me.) The problem is that the pde you gave cannot be interpreted as a pde on the annulus: The boundary condition forbids that. In fact, $(r,\varphi) \mapsto \varphi$ is not a harmonic function on the annulus, in particular, because it must have a jump. – Henrik Schumacher Feb 13 '19 at 13:35
  • @HenrikSchumacher Then I don't understand why the solution in polar coordinates does agree with the analytical solution (in an infinite domain). How would you model this problem numerically? – Asaf Miron Feb 13 '19 at 13:52

1 Answers1

8

In Cartesian coordinates, the solution $\theta $ has a gap on the line $y=0$.To get a solution, you need to make a cut and define a solution on both sides of the cut, for example:

R1 = 1; y0 = 0.01;
regionCyl = 
  DiscretizeRegion[
   RegionDifference[ImplicitRegion[Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= R1, {x, y}], 
    ImplicitRegion[-R1 <= x <= 0 && -y0 <= y <= y0, {x, y}]]];
laplacian = Laplacian[\[Theta][x, y], {x, y}];
boundaryCondition = {DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] == 
     ArcTan[x, y], x^2 + y^2 == R1^2], 
   DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] == Pi, y == y0], 
   DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] == -Pi, y == -y0]};
sol = NDSolveValue[{laplacian == 0, 
    boundaryCondition}, \[Theta], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl, 
   Method -> {"FiniteElement", 
     "InterpolationOrder" -> {\[Theta] -> 2}, 
     "MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.0001}}];


{DensityPlot[sol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl, 
  ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", PlotLegends -> Automatic, 
  ImageSize -> Medium], 
 ContourPlot[sol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl, 
  ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", PlotLegends -> Automatic, 
  ImageSize -> Medium, Contours -> 20]}

fig1

Alex Trounev
  • 44,369
  • 3
  • 48
  • 106
  • I see your point. Thanks @Alex Trounev – Asaf Miron Feb 14 '19 at 12:18
  • @AsafMiron You're welcome! – Alex Trounev Feb 14 '19 at 12:22
  • just wondering, is it straightforward to generalize this solution if instead of the Laplace equation theta I have two coupled nonlinear PDE for theta and another field? – Asaf Miron Feb 17 '19 at 18:44
  • Does this other field depend on theta and also have a gap? – Alex Trounev Feb 17 '19 at 19:46
  • Both fields are coupled by non-linear equations and depend on both x and y. I'm interested in boundary conditions that, similarly to my original post, are equal to $\phi$ along a circle centered around $x=x_{0},y=0$ and $-\phi$ along a circle centered around $x=-x_{0},y=0$. Thus, there is a gap along the interval $[-x_{0},x_{0}]$. Both circles have radius $R_{0}$ which is much smaller than $R_{1}$, the large outer circle radius. – Asaf Miron Feb 18 '19 at 07:43
  • If the equations are non-linear, we will not be able to directly use FEM. We'll have to start a new topic with this problem. – Alex Trounev Feb 18 '19 at 12:27
  • Sure thing, https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/191787/numerically-solving-2-coupled-nonlinear-pdes. Thank you so much for willing to help. – Asaf Miron Feb 18 '19 at 23:33