1

Using the same example code as in this question, is it possible to show all 10 plots (ie, each step of the manipulation) simultaneously?

If a manipulate function is a series of listplots based on a single variable, is it possible to show all list plots simultaneously (ie - to overlay all listplots as one static plot).

The only way I can think of doing this is copying & pasting the code n number of times, changing the variable for each one, naming each listplot & using 

Show [a,b,c,d...]

but this seems fairly labour intensive!

Community
  • 1
martin
  • 8,678
  • 4
  • 23
  • 70
  • Can you post sample code so we have a better idea of what the problem is? – bobthechemist Nov 10 '13 at 12:00
  • You can show multiple sets of data in a single plot: "ListPlot[{list1, list2, ...}] plots several lists of points." Is that what you want? –  Nov 10 '13 at 12:16
  • 1
    Hi, I'm afraid it's still not clear. The question above says "Using the same example code" but in a comment to an answer below you said you want to use functions instead of data. Generally speaking, ListPlot is for data and Plot is for functions, and you speak consistently of "listplot." The answer below seems on target, so I must not be getting what it is that you're after. Could you clarify further? Also, when possible it is better for questions to be self-contained. You could put example code into this question without making it much longer. – Michael E2 Nov 10 '13 at 13:59

1 Answers1

1

You create your plots (pay attention to the maximum plot range and the same image dimensions) with

plots = ListPlot[
 pdata = Table[Sin[2 \[Pi] x/12.34], {x, #}] + 
   RandomReal[.1, {#}], PlotRange -> {{0, 200}, {Automatic, Automatic}}, ImageSize -> {500, 200}] & /@Table[i, {i, 100, 200, 10}];

display them individually with

Manipulate[plots[[n]], {n, 1, Length[plots], 1}]

and show them all at once with

Show[plots]
Kardashev3
  • 1,354
  • 11
  • 22
  • @ Kardashev3, Thank you for your reply, but I am working with functions rather than data (see update of question above). - Sorry, I should have been clearer about this initially. – martin Nov 10 '13 at 12:29
  • @ martin: I have altered my answer to your needs, does ist work for you now? – Kardashev3 Nov 10 '13 at 17:23