I have noticed a function defined as such:
f[x_][y_] := expr;
How is the argument y in 2nd pair of brackets being used? What is the difference from defining a function this way:
f[x_, y_] := expr;
I have noticed a function defined as such:
f[x_][y_] := expr;
How is the argument y in 2nd pair of brackets being used? What is the difference from defining a function this way:
f[x_, y_] := expr;
It allows partial function application. Observe how function test1 defined this way can be called with the first argument, resulting in the return of another function of the remaining argument. Function test2 does not, and simply returns unevaluated since no match to its pattern occurs.
Clear[test1,test2]
test1[x_][y_]:=x^y
test2[x_,y_]:=x^y
test1[2][3]
(* 8 *)
test2[2,3]
(* 8 *)
test1[2]
(* test1[2] *)
%[3]
(* 8 *)
test2[2]
(* test2[2] *)
%[3]
(* test2[2][3] *)
test3 = test1[2], and then call test3 /@ Range[4]
– Jason B.
Nov 17 '15 at 12:11
f[something]as a separate object. You could for exampleMapit easily. See for example this question and the two answers: one uses subvalues ("double bracket") and the other uses downvalues (a single bracket) to achieve the same thing. The downvalues version needs to create new symbol names with extra definitions for each instance of the structure it's generating. The subvalues version doesn't. – Szabolcs Dec 31 '13 at 04:04