I'd quite like to be able to automatically generate C++ versions of certain mathematical expressions that I've manipulated in Mathematica. The resultant C++ code fragment is then going to be used independently of Mathematica.
Mathematica provides a CForm function, which almost seems like what I want, but I can't get it to do basic conversions nor tell it how to convert Mathematica symbols into my C++ identifiers.
For example, I would like the output from CForm[x[0]^2] or ToString[x[0]^2, CForm] to be "std::pow(obj.x_[0], 2)". This can be a string; it doesn't need to be usable in Mathematica any more. Of course, my actual expressions of interest are a lot more complicated than this.
But:
- I don't have a way of telling Mathematica that symbol
xis to be renamed toobj.x_(not a valid symbol name in Mathematica so can't use it directly). String manipulation after conversion is too unreliable for this so a more direct method is preferred. - I can't tell Mathematica that
xis an array, not a function, so it gives mex(0)instead ofobj.x_[0]. - Mathematica thinks I want to use its own
Powerfunction, but I'd really like to usestd::pow.
Perhaps CForm isn't suited to this task, but I would still appreciate a solution using any other available method if possible. I really think that Mathematica should be able to help me here, because it knows where I need brackets and so on.
I've tried:
Format[x[a_], CForm] :=
"obj.x_[" <> ToString[a, CForm] <> "]"
Format[Power[a_, b_], CForm] :=
"std::pow(" <> ToString[a, CForm] <> ", " <> ToString[b, CForm] <> ")"
ToString[x[0]^2, CForm]
but of course Power is protected so the second SetDelayed gives me an error, and my ToString[x[0]^2, CForm] output is really weird (Power("obj.x_[0]",2)) because I've tried to use strings in the Format.
SymbolicCinstead ofCForm. Have a look here. Would've been a dupe but is on SO, not here. It does not cover C++, but you can extend SymbolicC to cover the parts of C++ syntax you need. In general, this is a more robust solution. – Leonid Shifrin Apr 26 '14 at 22:05CExpressionrather than thegetCFormNoPowersSymCfunction there, butCExpressiondoesn't convert an expression to SymbolicC, so all I can do with it is pass toToCCodeString. This means I can't change the identifiers, and I'm still stuck withPowerinstead ofstd::pow(assuming I don't want to convert into repeated multiplication). – cyberSingularity Apr 26 '14 at 22:20CFormhas always seemed to be one of those cases where somebody at Wolfram Research once said "this design we came up with for output formatting is so general, it would be easy to make it generate C, or TeX, or Fortran, so let's go ahead and document it!" -- and after a few years they realized that it's a lot harder problem than it looks, and quietly let it drop. (Another example would be the idea that users can write their own Front End and hook it up to the Mathematica kernel by using standard, documented MathLink calls.) – librik Apr 27 '14 at 06:30powand enable that call by a namespace declarationusing std::powin a proceeding line. – alfC Dec 29 '15 at 10:26