3

I have to take the partial differentiation of an unknown function. For example, take the unknown function to be $g(x)$. Then it's derivative w.r.t $x$ is $g'(x)$.

By default, Mathematica differentiates the function. I want to keep the result of differentiation as $d(g(x))$ and not $g'(x)$. Is there any way to achieve this?

More precisely, I am using Conjugate[g[x]] as the unknown function and I want the output should be displayed only as d[Conjugate[g[x]] and not as Conjugate'[x]g'[x].

Also, can I handle the conjugate more efficiently than just carrying it all along in the code?

Michael E2
  • 235,386
  • 17
  • 334
  • 747

2 Answers2

4

If it is just the displayed form you are after, you can also go with HoldForm like so:

HoldForm@D[Conjugate[g[x]],x]

unevaluated

This will carry over throughout the notebook without further ado, until you call ReleaseHold on it.

I hope this might be of some help to you.

Jinxed
  • 3,753
  • 10
  • 24
3

Edited because the goal was changed in the comment:

This can be done by directly defining the outcome of Derivative when applied to g in the two combinations that you seem to be interested in:

Derivative[1][g][x_] := d[g[x]]

Derivative[1][Conjugate][g[x_]] := Conjugate[d[g[x]]]/d[g[x]];
Derivative[1][Conjugate][d[x_]] := Conjugate[d[d[x]]]/d[d[x]]

Derivative[1][d][x_] := d[d[x]]/d[x];
Derivative[1][d][x_Symbol] := d[d[x]]

On the second line, I used the fact that g is a generic function whose derivative under a Conjugate by default invokes the chain rule. All I do then is to reverse the chain rule by dividing by the factor d[g[x]] that the chain rule will produce. This leaves only the factor I want, and I then replace that by the desired outcome d[Conjugate[g[x]]].

The analogous thing is done for d to allow higher derivatives. The exception is when d[x] is encountered where x is the differentiation variable (which isn't in the question, but I expect may happen). Then there is no chain rule needed, and I therefore specify a separate rule for it with the pattern x_Symbol.

Here is the test:

D[g[x], x]

(* ==> d[g[x]] *)

D[Conjugate[g[x]], x]

(* ==> d[Conjugate[g[x]]] *)

D[g[x], x, x]

(* ==> d[d[g[x]]] *)

D[d[g[x]], x]

(* ==> d[d[g[x]]] *)

D[d[x], x]

(* ==> d[d[x]] *)

D[Conjugate[g[x]], x]

(* ==> Conjugate[d[g[x]]] *)

D[Conjugate[g[x]], x, x]

(* ==> Conjugate[d[d[g[x]]]] *)

Now the remaining issue is to replace the repeated application of d by formatting of the type d^2 g[x] for d[d[g[x]]]. I'll wait to see if this is really desired before doing it.

Jens
  • 97,245
  • 7
  • 213
  • 499
  • 1
    Thanks for your input. This is exactly what I need. Can you please modify the output of D[Conjugate[g[x]], x] as Conjugate[d[g[x]] and not as d[Conjugate[g[x]]] . You are free to change the above mentioned approach of yours if needed. Anyways, Many Many thanks for your input. – Shivam Sahu Mar 05 '15 at 12:41
  • 1
    You just hve to do this: Derivative[1][Conjugate][g[x_]] := Conjugate[d[g[x]]]/d[g[x]] (but that's not what you asked in the question. – Jens Mar 05 '15 at 14:51
  • 1
    Thanks. This serves my purpose well. Can you please also help me with obtaining the double derivative of g[x] and Conjugate[g[x]] as d^2 g[x] and Conjugate[d^2[g[x]]]. I tried it all this time but I am unable to obtain the above desired representation. – Shivam Sahu Mar 07 '15 at 17:48
  • 1
    What you're asking now is very different from the original question because it aims for a new formatting that is inconsistent with Mathematica syntax (because of the squares). It would require box-level manipulations as I did here. – Jens Mar 07 '15 at 18:36