tl;dr Currently, this part of Mathematica is not designed to be extensible.
A few months ago I looked into how GraphPropertyDistribution and related functions are implemented, and whether they are extensible. As you may know, there are some limited ways to read the definition of some built-in symbols.
My goal was to integrate IGraph/M with functions such as RandomGraph, GraphPropertyDistribution, etc. I expected that at least automated numerical computation with graph property distribution may work, and I hoped that I would be able to add symbolic definitions for special cases.
What I found is this:
There are internal checks on what is a proper graph distribution or graph property. Therefore it is not sufficient to add on extra definitions to top-level symbols. It would be necessary to "register" new distributions/properties internally.
Much of the internal implementation of this functionality is not only ReadProtected, but also Locked (and therefore unmodifiable).
Conclusion: I do not think it is worth bothering (or safe) to extend these symbols.
Instead, define your own functions for each sub-functionality that you need. For example, IGraph/M has functions for sampling from certain random graph models (e.g. IGDegreeSequenceGame). These do only sampling and nothing else.
BernoulliGraphDistribution[]orPriceGraphDistribution[]) and not probability distributions proper. I'm not sure why this has upvotes... – J. M.'s missing motivation Aug 05 '17 at 12:57