1

The Weyl invariance symmetry of the Polyakov action is said to be considered as the invariance of the theory under a local change of scale which preserves the angles between all lines.

However, why does the Weyl transformation $g_{\alpha \beta} (\sigma) \to \Lambda ^2 (\sigma) g_{\alpha \beta} (\sigma)$, where $\sigma$ is the worldsheet coordinate, preserve the angles? Could somebody prove it mathematically?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
Simon
  • 362
  • 4
    See e.g. here (conformal transformations are closely related to Weyl symmetry). Also take a look at this related question. – Danu Sep 10 '15 at 08:36
  • Locally, the conformal transformation is isotropic in the sense that the change to a vector's length is independent of the vector's direction. This must mean that all angles are preserved. – Robin Ekman Sep 10 '15 at 14:43
  • 2
    @Danu In fact, I want an answer more explicit in mathematics, and it is below. Thanks for your advice! – Simon Sep 10 '15 at 14:45

1 Answers1

3

Consider two vector fields $a^\mu(x)$ and $b^\mu(x)$ in a space-time. The local angle between the two vector fields is given by $$ \cos\theta(x) = \frac{ a(x) \cdot b(x) }{ \|a(x)\| \|b(x)\| } = \frac{ g_{\mu\nu}(x) a^\mu(x) b^\nu(x) }{ \left| g_{\alpha\beta} a^\alpha(x) a^\beta(x) \right|^{\frac{1}{2}} \left| g_{\rho\sigma} (x) b^\rho(x) b^\sigma(x) \right|^{\frac{1}{2} } } $$ Note that this is a direct analog of what the definition of angle between vectors is in flat ${\mathbb R}^3$. It should be clear from the formula above that $\theta(x)$ is invariant under a Weyl transformation $g_{\mu\nu}(x) \to \Lambda^2(x) g_{\mu\nu}(x)$.

Prahar
  • 25,924