2

Greeting, I am working on a problem that involves optimizing the shape of a tank so that the level drops at a constant rate.

Problem and my attempt

Working on the problem, here is what I know. There is an axially symmetrical tank whose wall shape is given by $f(z) = R(\frac{z}{H})^n$ which is shown in the figure. The spigot of the tank has cross-sectional area, a and there is no vena contracta. What I need to do is find $n$ so I can satisfy these conditions.

Here is what I have done so far to start on the problem. I am assuming that the area where the spigot is in the tank will not have any significant effects on the total volume of the tank if I integrate.

Doing a mass balance on the tank I get that

  1. $In-out+Generation = Accumulation$ where $Generation; In = 0$

  2. $-\rho Q_{out}=\frac{\rho dV}{dT}$ as a consequence of the mass balance. And since density is constant $-Q_{out}=\frac{dV}{dT}$

  3. To get $Q_{out}$ use the fact that $u_2a = Q_{out}$

  4. Using Bernoulli's Equation to get an expression for $u_2$. Between 1 and 2 I get $\frac{u_1^2}2+gz_1+\frac{P_1}{\rho}=\frac{u_2^2}2+gz_2+\frac{P_2}{\rho}$

  5. Using the relation that $P_1=P_2=P_{atm}$ (4) can be simplified to $\frac{u_1^2}2+gz_1+=\frac{u_2^2}2+gz_2$ and saying that $u_1 = \frac{dz}{dt}$ I now have $\frac{\frac{dz}{dt}^2}2+gz_1+=\frac{u_2^2}2+gz_2$

  6. Solving (5) for $u_2$ I get that $u_2 = \frac{dz}{dt} + \sqrt{2g(z_1-z_2)}$

My issue

This is where I start to run into issues relating what I know. I know that $\frac{dz}{dt} = constant$ and I know that I need to solve for $n$ in the $f(z)$ function. I am guess that do solve equation (2) for the volume of the tank which is $a_t\frac{dz}{dt}$. I assume since $\frac{dz}{dt}$ is present on both sides it will cancel out. Why does the rate of the flow even matter though? Why is it not valid just to say that the velocity of the water in the tank will be irrelevant in comparison to the velocity coming out of the spigot? Typically that is a valid assumption, or am I in correct in that?

And one small struggle is getting the area of the tank by just knowing $f(z)$. It has been a while since I've done calculus. The first thought in my mind is a solid of revolution. I think that $f(z)$ is a function that relates z and radius so $r = f(z) = R(\frac{z}{H})^n$ and if so, would I be doing $V = \int_a^b \pi r^2 dz$ which is $ V = \int_a^b \pi R(\frac{z}{H})^n dz$? This integral seems very difficult to calculate though and leads me to believe that I have done something wrong. Any push in the right direction would be greatly appreciated!

enter image description here

sammy gerbil
  • 27,277
  • 1
  • Assuming the liquid is incompressible, you can ignore mass and use volume instead. 2. What is f(z)? Is that the same as r? 3. The integral of $z^n$ is hard?? It is basic. 4. The velocity of the water in the tank is only negligible if the area of the water surface is much larger than the area of the spigot. This is not true when z is small.
  • – sammy gerbil Sep 25 '16 at 16:46
  • I believe f(z) = r. With that, I think I realized I was way overthinking some aspects such as the integral. Would I need to integrate to get volume or could I just get the area and say that Volume is Area* $\frac{dz}{dt}$? If so I could just do the integral of $R \frac{1}{H^n} \int_0^H z^n dz$. – JuliusDariusBelosarius Sep 25 '16 at 17:36
  • @sammygerbil - you make a good point for small $z$ however i would argue that most of the mechanical energy change has already happened so this incurs only a small error. However, it is a bit weird that at $r(0)=0$ i.e. there is no outflow because the geometry is closed. OP would benefit from assuming a different form of $f\left(r\right)=\frac{r-r_0}{r_f-r_0}=\left( \frac{z-z_0}{z_f-z_0}\right )^n$ where $r_0$ corresponds to the radius of the outflow area, $a$. – nluigi Sep 26 '16 at 09:11
  • @nluigi : OP can keep the form $r(z)=R(z/H)^n$ if he does not assume that the spigot is at $z=0$. – sammy gerbil Sep 26 '16 at 11:34
  • Your Step #6 does not follow from Step #5. – sammy gerbil Sep 27 '16 at 00:18