2

Lets say we have the following problem:

We are given some charge configuration in 3D, $\rho (s,\theta)$ (cylindrical coordinates), which doesn't depend on z. Let's say that the total charge is zero.

This charge distribution creates some electric field $E(s,\theta)$. The magnetic field is, obviously, zero everywhere.

Now we start rotating this charge configuration around the z-axis. What happens to the EM-field? I think that the electric field will remain the same (except that it rotates), and there will be some magnetic field induced. Is there some universal transformation formula for EM-fields under rotation? The rotation velocity is non relativistic!

Hint: I am looking for a formula like $\vec{E'} = \vec E+\vec v \times \vec B$, which transforms the magnetic field.

Thank you!

Samuel
  • 120

1 Answers1

0

I think since you have axial symmetry, $\rho=\rho(r,\theta)$, you can decompose your charge density into infinitely thin loops carrying current of

$$ I(r,\theta)drd\theta=r\omega\rho(r,\theta)rd\theta dr $$

$\omega$ here is your system's angular speed.

Now you just use equation for field of current loop and integrate over $r$ and $\theta$.

You can see how this is applied in case of the rotating charged disk here.

Finally, you will have to go and integrate over $z$ as well, of course.

Eric Angle
  • 2,926
  • Hey, thanks for the quick response. Yes, I agree that this would be a very elegant solution. But unfortunately, there is no axial symmetry, as $\rho$ depends on $\theta$ :( – Samuel Mar 24 '17 at 17:42
  • @SamuelBosch ok, maybe i don't understand something here. What is your coordinate system? Cylindrical or spherical coordinates? In any way, idea is to present each small fraction of $]rho$ as single loop with current proportional to $\omega$ and integrate. $\rho$ can be anything, symmetries just make integration easier in practice – aaaaa says reinstate Monica Mar 24 '17 at 18:29
  • Sorry, I should have made it more clear that I was thinking about cylindrical coordinates. Therefore it is not a very good approximation to take small current loops. – Samuel Mar 24 '17 at 19:18
  • if coordinates are cylindrical and charge density does not depend on Z then thin loops of current should work OK. Just figure out $B(z,r)$ for current loop first. Also cylindrical coordinates are usually $(r, \theta, z)$, not $(s, \theta)$ – aaaaa says reinstate Monica Mar 24 '17 at 19:27