0

Let $A,B$ be two non commuting observables, then we do know that

$\langle (\Delta A)^2 \rangle \cdot \langle (\Delta B)^2 \rangle \geq \frac{|[A,B]|^2}{ 4}.$ Also, we do know that, when the system is in an eigenfunction state of $B$, then $\Delta B = 0$, but this state in general does not have to be an eigenstate of $A$, so $\Delta A \not =0$, but the product is clearly $\langle (\Delta A)^2 \rangle \cdot \langle (\Delta B)^2 \rangle = 0$ even though the RHS is not zero.

I'm sure I'm missing something, but couldn't figure out what it is. I've looked some question similar to this one in this site, but all of them were about the position and the momentum operators, which are pathological.

Our
  • 2,263
  • 2
    You have not, in fact, exhibited any state for which the r.h.s. is not zero (and you are missing an expectation value around the r.h.s). See the first paragraph of this answer of mine for an explicit demonstration that the UP holds. – ACuriousMind Jan 20 '19 at 10:31
  • @ACuriousMind I will check that answer; if the system is in a state which is an eigenfunction of $B$, but not $A$, then in general the commutator is also nonzero for that state.I'm sure one can find an explicit example for that, but I'm relatively new to the subject, and don't know much example. – Our Jan 20 '19 at 10:37
  • @ACuriousMind After looking into your answer; apparently one cannot find such an example :) Thanks a lot. – Our Jan 20 '19 at 10:39

2 Answers2

2

Your claim that the r.h.s. is zero is simply incorrect. The general Robertson-Schrödinger uncertainty relation is $$ \sigma_A(\psi)\sigma_B(\psi) \geq \langle \frac{1}{2}[A,B]\rangle_\psi,$$ where $\sigma_A(\psi)$ is the standard deviation of $A$ in the state $\psi$ (also ofen denoted $\Delta A$) and $\langle ...\rangle_\psi$ is the expectation value in the state $\psi$. Note that the value of the r.h.s. is dependent on the state: Even if the commutator in general is non-zero, the r.h.s. of the uncertainty relation can be.

Now, if $\psi$ is an eigenstate of $B$ with eigenvalue $b$, then the r.h.s. works out as follows: $$ \langle \psi \vert \frac12 [A,B]\vert \psi\rangle = \frac12 \left(\langle \psi \vert AB\vert\psi\rangle -\langle \psi\vert BA\vert \psi\rangle \right) = \frac12 \left(\langle \psi \vert Ab\vert\psi\rangle -\langle \psi\vert bA\vert \psi\rangle \right) = \frac{b}2 \left(\langle A\rangle_\psi - \langle A\rangle_\psi \right) = 0.$$ That is, for every eigenstate of one of the two observables in the uncertainty principle, the r.h.s. is always zero and therefore the uncertainty relation is trivially fulfilled regardless of the value of the standard deviation of the other observable.

ACuriousMind
  • 124,833
  • Then, this implies that the commutator of any two observables is an operator that has zero eigenvalues since the commutator is zero is any eigenfunction of the observables in the commutator relation (Except for $\hat x, and \hat p$ I guess) ? – Our Jan 20 '19 at 13:01
  • @onurcanbektas No, it only implies that there are states in which the commutator has zero expectation value. These would only be zero eigenstates if the standard deviation of $[A,B]$ also vanished, but you cannot show that from just the assumption that it's an eigenstate of $B$. – ACuriousMind Jan 20 '19 at 13:04
  • You are right; I confused it with a different question in my mind. – Our Jan 20 '19 at 13:06
-2

To see this, you have to be a Little more mathematical precise. Consider the commutator

$[A,B]=AB-BA$.

Take the norm $||...||_n$ (with natural number $n$ as a parameter) defined by $||X||_n=E_n(X^2)$ for any Operator $X$ and the Quantum expectation value $E_n$ given by the relation:

$E_n(X) = <\psi^{(n)}|X|\psi^{(n)}>$.

Now I clarify the Parameter $n$: We can define a sequence $|\psi^{(n)}>$ of wave functions that converge to the correct wave function $|\psi^{(n)}>$ in the Limit $n \mapsto \infty$. So we have only the Quantum state as a Limit of a sequence! Now proceed with computing the norm and using triangle inequality

$||[A,B]||_n = ||AB-BA||_n \leq ||AB||_n+||BA||_n \leq ||A||_n||B||_n+||B||_n||A||_n = 2 ||B||_n||A||_n$.

Let $B'$ be the Operator where the state $|\psi>$ is eigenstate. Then, the Operator

$B = B' - <B'>$ has the following norm:

$||B'-<B'>||_n \mapsto 0$ as $n \mapsto \infty$.

But: If $n$ is not at infinity, we have a very very Tiny remainder that we can denote by $\epsilon_n>0$. So in General we have

$||B'-<B'>||_n=\epsilon_n$. Thus we will have for the value $A$:

$||A||_n \geq \frac {||[A,B]||_n }{2 \epsilon_n}$.

Letting $\epsilon_n$ to Zero in the Limit $n \mapsto \infty$, we will see that the uncertainty of the other Operator $||A||_n$ tends to infinity. Uncertainty for one Operator goes only in Limit to Zero, while the other goes to infinity in the limit.

kryomaxim
  • 3,428
  • Don't get me wrong, but starting your answer by saying "you have to be little more mathematically precise" , and then saying "very tiny tiny remainder" is funny. – Our Jan 20 '19 at 12:05
  • This answer makes no sense to me. Where did you get the $\psi^{(n)}$ states from? Your conclusion is also wrong: The uncertainty of the other operator diverges only in pathological cases like continuous unbounded operators like position and momentum. For bounded operators, there is nothing we can (or need to) say about the uncertainty of $A$ because the r.h.s. is already identically zero for any eigenstate of $B$. – ACuriousMind Jan 20 '19 at 12:47