1

enter image description here

So in this example I want to find the extension produced in the spring. The two methods are given in the image.( First one is by force method and the other one is energy method). The two yield different results. Where did I commit the mistake? In the second method I have assumed that kinetic energy of the block is zero as it is slowly released, not suddenly.

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
  • 1
    Why is the gravitational potential energy using $h$ in second case? I thought the height over the ground is usually used. Hooke's law uses displacement from resting spring or something, which is not height over ground. – Emil May 27 '20 at 05:33
  • 1
    @Emil I believe OP's $h$ is not height over ground, but change from equilibrium position and in gravitational potential energy you can set an arbitrary point as zero potential energy, so notations are OK. – Agnius Vasiliauskas May 27 '20 at 06:10
  • Very related: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/364370/ –  May 27 '20 at 06:41
  • Related: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/278462/2451 , https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/266129/2451 and links therein. – Qmechanic May 27 '20 at 07:05
  • Please use a more descriptive title – Dale May 27 '20 at 12:40
  • This question is asked so often on this site. I have given three examples, I'm sure if you search you can find more. – BioPhysicist May 27 '20 at 12:43

2 Answers2

3

Explanation

Your force method give you the point where the net force on the body is zero, or in other words, the equilibrium point. Whereas, the energy method gives you the point where the velocity of the block is zero. Note that $v=0\nRightarrow a=0$. In other words, zero velocity doesn't imply zero acceleration, and thus zero velocity doesn't imply zero force (because $F=ma$). So both the locations, the location of zero force/acceleration and the location of zero velocity, are different, and so you get different answers from both your methods.

Symmetry of the situation

The factor of two can be explained by the symmetric nature of the force about the equilibrium point. In this case the force is symmetric because of its linearity ($F\propto x$). So the journey from the start to the equilibrium position is just the reversed version of the journey from the equilibrium position to rest again, which implies the equilibrium point is exactly in the middle of the two extremes.

Simple Harmonic Motion

In case you're curious, the block, once left, will undergo simple harmonic motion (of course, we are neglecting resistive forces like air drag or friction) which is a special type of oscillatory motion. The following GIF gives a nice intuition of this kind of motion:

gif

GIF Source, you can yourself try out the simulation there.

  • Indeed, noticing that it starts at rest and ends at rest (and invoking a symmetry argument that the zero acceleration point will be directly in the middle) nicely explains the factor of 2 between the two answers. – jacob1729 May 27 '20 at 11:13
  • @jacob1729 I suppose I should more explicitly point out the symmetry of the situation. Thanks for suggesting! Updating... –  May 27 '20 at 11:14
1

In general, when both gravity and spring force do work, conservation of mechanical energy gives: $$ K+U_{grav}+U_{spring}=k $$ However, in our case,there is also work that your hand does on the block while you try to maintain equilibrium (as the block gradually stretches the spring). And this is where your problem started. You failed to realize in this case, that your hand also contributes to the work done on the block. It's not only gravity and spring force that do work on the block while you carefully lay it down; your hand too does work on it. If we represent this work that your hand does as $W_{ other}$ then the energy equation would include this external work (generally called work done by other non-conservative forces) and the expression becomes: $$ K_1+U_{1\,grav}+ U_{1\, spring}+W_{ other}=K_2+ U_{2\, grav}+ U_{2\, spring} $$ Since both $K_1\, and\, K_2$ are zero, and taking the origin as the initial length of the spring, the equation reduces to: $$ W_{ other}=-mgh+\frac{1}{2}kh^2 $$ In truth, this is all we can write about the motion of the block if we use energy methods. We can go ahead to solve $W_{other}$ for the force you apply since we know $h$ from Hooke's law. Solving for $W_{other}$ and substituting $h=\frac{1}{k}mg$ $$ \begin{align} W_{other}&=h\left(\frac{1}{2}kh-mg\right)\\W_{other}&=h\left(-\frac{1}{2}mg\right)\\\therefore W_{other}&=-\frac{1}{2}mgh \end{align} $$ Provided the block is at equilibrium at each displacement,the work that you do is exactly half the work that gravity does and is always constant.