0

If all matter was created in the Big Bang (not counting spontaneous generation of particle-antiparticle pairs), wouldn't that imply that a finite (if very large) amount of matter exists in the Universe?

By the same token, wouldn't that imply that the Universe is spatially "finite", i.e. a compact (if boundaryless) 3D manifold?

If not, why not?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
Rivers McForge
  • 540
  • 1
    Related: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/9419/2451 , https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/1915/2451 and links therein. – Qmechanic Oct 02 '20 at 19:41
  • Have you read about Friedmann universes with $k=0$ and $k=-1$? – G. Smith Oct 02 '20 at 20:51
  • @G.Smith I mean, writing down equations is one thing, but being physically possible is another, and I have a sneaking suspicion that solutions of those equations with $k = 0, -1$ might be unphysical to begin with. – Rivers McForge Oct 03 '20 at 00:49
  • Mainstream physics does not consider these models to be unphysical. – G. Smith Oct 03 '20 at 03:48

1 Answers1

1

All we really know is that all of the matter in the observable universe was a very uniform, very hot, expanding plasma about 13.7 billion years ago. We don't know where that came from. "Big bang" is just a name for our ignorance.

Whatever process produced that state could plausibly have produced a region of finite or infinite size. Whether it's finite or infinite, it could be just one part of a larger universe. At this point we just don't know.

benrg
  • 26,103