3

If emissivity and reflectivity are inversely proportionate, why does glass have a high emissivity of around 0.95-0.97 as well as being very reflective for IR Radiation?

normally it works but not with glass!

Can anyone explain this?

ABC
  • 2,469
  • 2
    Can you quote your source for the high reflectivity of IR by glass. As far as I know the emissivity remains around 90-95% and the reflectance 5 - 10% out to at least 2,500nm. – John Rennie Apr 03 '13 at 11:16
  • I do not have a exact number, but i use thermal cameras often and often see reflections incredibly easily showing very high or low temperatures. for example when looking up at a house the top windows may show -20 Degrees C from the reflection of the sky. – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 11:49
  • 1
    Dear Chris, this isn't necessarily an argument that the reflectivity is high. It may just mean that your digital camera becomes more sensitive at smaller light intensity, the dependence of the response on energy flux is nonlinear. – Luboš Motl Apr 03 '13 at 12:06
  • Could it be that the reflectivity is angle dependent, and you're looking at the windows from a shallow angle? – jkej Apr 03 '13 at 12:06
  • no not a digital camera sorry, with a range of thermal cameras. and also it has the same result at any angle, head on you can see yourself, looking up at a large angle of incidence you can pick up the low temperature of the sky. – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 12:16
  • @ChrisDeakin What is the temperature of the window? Have you tried to approximate what the reflectivity would need to be to get -20 C? – jkej Apr 03 '13 at 12:23
  • this could be an external ambient temperature of say 0 to 10 degrees, internal would be say 22 (C) i am not sure on the temperature of the sky, i think its around -20 to -30. and the window may show on a clear day -15 to -20 with a steep enough angle to reflect the sky – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 12:27
  • What wavelength region is the camera sensitive to? Have you tried pointing the camera directly at the sky to see what temeperature reading you get? – jkej Apr 03 '13 at 12:31
  • yes that could be around -10 to -30 from what i remember, but normally the cameras will not go lower than -20. the spec sheet says 7.5 to 14um – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 12:34
  • 1
    Dear @ChrisDeakin, fine, so replace the digital camera by "thermal camera" in my comment. Nothing else is changed, the problem is still the same. You're not really measuring the quantities you're claiming to measure (reflectivity), you're just using your (misleading) intuition to estimate it. The law you don't like always holds. – Luboš Motl Apr 03 '13 at 12:47
  • Ok, the atmosphere is close to transperent in a large part of that wavelength region (roughly 9.5-13.5 um I think) so the brightness temperature of the sky could be significantly lower than -20 (maybe around -200 or so). If your camera will not go lower than -20 that could explain why you don't see it. – jkej Apr 03 '13 at 12:50
  • or if the sky is around -200 then 10 percent reflection wouldn't be far off, with 90% emmisivity. but still if i point the camera at the glass i can clearly see myself, only loosing a couple of degrees from if i took an image of myself direct without being reflected. – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 13:06
  • i have just tried it now, i have stood inside looking at a glass window around 1 meter away from it, my external temperature is around 33 degrees, my temperature as seen in the glass is 26 degrees, the room temperature is 22 degrees, the external temperature is 7 degrees, the glass temperature is around 5-10 degrees (hard to measure with thermal camera) – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 13:14
  • i have also gone out with a camera that goes to -40 and measured from the glass, reading 0.3 degrees, the temperature of the sky from where it was reflecting from was 20.1 degrees. its 7 degrees outside and i assume the glass will be that temperature too, maybe colder with the wind? – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 13:20
  • Yes, that seems to indicate a high reflectivity (~70% with window temeperature 10 deg, ~36% with window temperature 22 deg), assuming the camera works properly. To get a better estimate of the reflectivity, you could do the same measurements but on something significantly hotter than yourself. Maybe som sort of appliance (toaster, waffle iron, etc). – jkej Apr 03 '13 at 13:48
  • the camera is calibrated to 2% at the worst to very highly tuned equipment. i will try this again with a mug filled with hot water and post back asap – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 13:56
  • If you have an estimate rather than a well calibrated measurement of the reflectivity then I have to agree with @LubošMotl here. The principle in question is a re-statement of the conservation of energy, and as such should be treated as very reliable, while you seem to be relying on a chain of assumptions (about the radiation temperature of the sky in that band, the behavior of the instrument and your own visual performance) to estimate your input figures. That's always a risk when doing ad hoc experiments, and even experienced scientists can get surprised from time to time. – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Apr 03 '13 at 14:00
  • hmm, the window is around 15-20 degrees. the cup is 67.3 degrees. and the reflection is around 29.2 degrees (cup was inside, inside temperature of 22, outside of 7 still – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 14:04
  • on the outside test pointing at the area of sky reflected the temperature was accurate to 0.1 degree same with the reflection and external temperature the only wide band was the glass. but i can see how this could still sway the results. i just wanted to know if anyone could explain why or prove my speculations wrong – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 14:08
  • Emissivity and Reflectivity and NOT inversely proportional (their product is constant). They are complementary: their sum is constant. – JEB Jan 29 '18 at 17:24

8 Answers8

4

According to this article the lenses on thermal cameras are not made from glass, but rether from Germanium, CZinc Selenide or Zinc Sulfide. These materials are not transparent to light so it's quite reasonable for them to have a high reflectivity.

Response to comment:

The emissivity and reflectivity only have to add up to one at the same wavelength. So if the emissivity is high for infra-red that doesn't clash with the reflectivity being high for visible light. This (or rather it's converse) is exactly why greenhouses heat up in visible light. They have a high emissivity and low reflectivity at visible wavelengths but a low emissivity and high reflectivity at IR wavelengths.

John Rennie
  • 355,118
  • yes that they do, very reflective (make great mirrors)! and yes i understand the germanium lenses by my problem is when looking at glass i.e windows ect – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 14:24
  • @ChrisDeakin: I've amended my answer to respond to your comment – John Rennie Apr 03 '13 at 14:30
  • both emissivity and reflection are in IR, through temperatures between -20 to 70 they all seem to have high emissivity and high levels reflections when viewed with a thermal camera – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 14:39
  • How can you judge the reflectivity of the IR light? Are you photographing the reflections with a second IR camera? – John Rennie Apr 03 '13 at 15:12
  • i am sorry i am confused. the IR light? the IR energy is that emitted from either me, a hot cup or the cold sky as explained in my experiments in the comments above. i am looking at the glass and measuring the reflection in the glass using the IR camera, i will then point the camera at the object that is being reflected in the glass (such as my skin, the cup or the sky. i only use one IR camera to take both measurements – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 15:18
  • If you try to photograph the hot cup/cold sky through a pane of glass does that work? If not, you have shown that the glass has a high reflectivity and low emissivity, which is about right for 10-15 micron light. – John Rennie Apr 03 '13 at 15:38
3

I experienced the same problem: too often, the emission value of glass is misquoted in different sources on the internet, as I found to my own dismay. My own calculations found about an average reflectivity R of 0.2, transmittance T of 0.4 and absorption of 0.4 for glass of about 2mm thick. (I calculated those values using absorption spectrum graphs of wikipedia for soda lime glass, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soda-lime_glass, using black body radiation curve to get a weighed average, and hemispherical averaging to account for the different reflectivity, transmittance and absorbance for different angles at the same wavelength). The emission value for glass quoted is often 0.82, however: this cannot be right. The error is in the fact that only the 0.2 reflectivity of glass is deducted from 1, instead of both transmittance and reflectivity. The glass absorption coefficient for glass is (kirchhoff law) equal to the emissivity of glass, and thus equal to approximately 0.4, or 40 percent. When I used this emission value in the heat transport model that I created, the outcome was a calculated U value of about 6 W/m2*Kelvin for the glass plate, in good agreement with the value to be expected for a glass plate.

2

I highly recommend to read "The Ultimate Infrared Handbook for R&D Professionals". There's a thing that many of you are not saying reflection, transmission and absoprtion depend on the wavelength. Your are probably measuring with normal spectrometers which measure up to 2000 nm. Must IR cameras for example InSb detecta between 3000 to 5000 nm in that region glass is opaque that is why is reported has a close to 1 value for example "glass has an emissivity of 0.85–0.90 in the 8–14 μm waveband" which is the region for MCT, QWIP and Microbolometer. The other part is that glass reflections are specular because of the polished. Also in the region below 8 μm there is a lot of objects reflecting as you may expect by Wiens law. Here you can see some considerations if you are trying to measure temperature in glass.

1

To me the problem is not linked to the reflectance, but to the surface finish.

Picking up an image of a reflection in the visible part of the spectrum is possible even on a black carbon surface if that surface is polished well enough. To convince yourself of this, simply pick a dark material with a well polished surface (or a not so well polished surface but placed at an highly inclined angle). Then place the surface to reflect the sky day light. And you will see the surface reflecting the color of the sky even if the surface color is blue, red or any other dark color/tint.

Thus, since the glass window is a well polished surface, it will reflect any image of the surrounding in the thermal infrared. This is also true for the sky in the visible part of the spectrum as would tell you any bird that survives hitting a cleaned glass window at spring time... ;-)

1

One has to be careful with reflection. If you take a car rear-view mirror, it might seem to be close to 100% reflectivity, but in practice may be around only 60% (this is helped partly because the inside of the car is usually darker than the outside). If you couple this with the usual compressed, pseudo-color look up table that most thermal cameras use, the apparent reflectivity of objects can be 'accentuated'.

Dave-Oh
  • 11
1

In an isothermal steady state condition, meaning when the temperature is uniform and not changing with time,

%Reflected + %Transmitted + % Absorbed = 100%

For opaque system,

%Reflected + % Absorbed = 100% .........(1)

Now, if the object absorbs infrared radiation, its energy (and thus temperature) will increase, but as the object is in steady state, to offset that increase in temperature, the rate of emission must be equal to the rate of absorption. So,

% Absorbed = % Emitted.

Substituting in equation (1),

%Reflected + % Emitted = 100% .........(2).

So reflectivity is reciprocal to emissivity.

For translucent system,

%Reflected + %Transmitted + % Emitted = 100%.........(3).

This is the associated physics.

normally it works but not with glass!

It is true for glass also, only transmissivity comes into picture, but still, reflectivity is reciprocal to emissivity.

  • Glass Is not thermally transmissive, i understand what the text books say and the equations, but still this doesn't explain why glass has such a high emissivity and reflectivity? the glass has a high emissivity, and thus a high rate of absorption, it also is highly reflective in all my experience, you can clearly see reflections with a thermal camera. – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 12:43
1

Based on the experiments you describe in the comments, it seems like you might very well have a reflectivity of 20-30% in your window, for the spectral region where your camera measure. The question is where you got the high emissivity numebers from. It seems likely that the problem is that you're assuming the emissivity and reflectivity is the same throughout the infrared region. The high emissivity might be for another part of the spectrum than where your camera measure.

jkej
  • 6,148
  • the emissivity is around 0.9 to 0.97 (90%-97%) on multiple emissivity tables from multiple places. – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 15:07
  • Ok, but do you know what wavelength region that is for? – jkej Apr 03 '13 at 15:13
  • i don't, no. so is it possible the reflections i am picking up from temperatures between -30 to 70 are going to be different to those at higher temperatures (different wave lengths) – Chris Deakin Apr 03 '13 at 15:21
1

The law of energy conservation certainly also applies here. What is not reflected will be absorbed. R+A=1 has to hold. And according to Kirchoff's law E=A (absorptivity is emissivity) you could write R=1-E. If you have to consider transmission through the glass as well, then R+A+T=1 would hold. You do not specify what type of glass you are talking about, what wavelength (or wavelength band) and what incident angle you are talking. E.g. for window glass you will have approx. 10% reflection and 90% emissivity at room-temperature radiation (brightness temperature) and normal incidence (=0° =perpend. to surface). For incidence angles greater than 81° you will get 50% reflection and 50% emissivity. If you state that glass has a high IR-reflectivity then you might think of lowE-coated glass as used in insulated glazing units. In this case you will have to consider all coated and uncoated layers of all windows pane. But again for each layer the law of energy conservation will apply. You can find a lot read more about the emissivity and reflectivity of window glass and all relevant dependences in my open-access publication.