It appears in this post, but practically nowhere else. Is it a really existing theorem, or is it a joke?
Asked
Active
Viewed 271 times
1
-
8https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shm-reduplication – Nihar Karve Feb 15 '21 at 07:45
-
2Please explain the -1. – mma Feb 15 '21 at 07:54
-
8I’m voting to close this question because it is about language, not physics. – Emilio Pisanty Feb 15 '21 at 09:08
-
3I wonder what I should have done if I didn’t know this language turn, so I don’t even know if it’s physics or anything else. – mma Feb 15 '21 at 09:25
-
1You might ask about Shm-reduplication in one of the Stack Exchange communities where people talk about language usage. – rob Feb 16 '21 at 23:08
-
1@rob If I had known it was an Shm reduplication, I wouldn’t have had to ask anything.:) – mma Feb 17 '21 at 05:20
-
@mma A possibly-related Meta question. – rob Feb 17 '21 at 06:48
1 Answers
4
It's a dismissive snowclone, sometimes spelled without the c. This example prefaces a correction with a warning that a purported theorem is incorrect.
J.G.
- 24,837