I am analyzing some observational data which includes the ratio of masses (two masses for the same object, but measured using different methods). In principle, it is largely arbitrary whether one chooses to consider the ratio of Mass A to Mass B or vice versa.
I want to perform some basic statistical analysis, such as excluding outliers and calculating mean/median/stdev. The nature of this dataset is such that ratios of A:B will typically range from 0.01-1, and as such ratios of B:A will range from 1-100. This makes me think that, actually, whether I choose to use A:B or B:A will matter, because in each case, the mean and median are different (and opposite types of outliers are excluded when using z-score).
My intuition is that B:A is the preferred quantity to use, because surely most statistical techniques are designed with a range greater than 0-1 in mind. But I'm not totally sure. It might be worth mentioning that I have already presented some results in A:B, so if it truly doesn't matter I'd probably go with that.
I would appreciate any advice. Thank you!
Unless you were asking if I had a dataset of measurements all for one object -- no, it's two measurements for each object and I've updated the question to clarify that since it was a bit ambigious before)
– lordnoob Mar 28 '22 at 16:49