and so if a proton is so larger than an electron doesn't that mean it has a shape? What would be the shape of a subatomic particle? are they spherical?
Does the fact that protons and neutrons have larger mass than electrons mean they're bigger in size?
-
Related: http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/53023/ – jinawee Jan 31 '14 at 21:02
2 Answers
Does the fact that protons and neutrons have larger mass than electrons mean they're bigger in size?
No. The electron and muon are both believed to be "point-like" (which really means smaller than we can measure" despite having $\frac{m_\mu}{m_e} \approx 200$.
That is not to say the proton isn't bigger---it is---but that mass does not imply size in any simple way.
if a proton is so larger than an electron doesn't that mean it has a shape?
Yes. To date, not electric dipole moment has been observed which implies the proton is a sphere to high precision. (Probably I ought to say something about tensor form-factors here, but I'd be out of my depth.)
If string theory is correct, then the particles will be the shape of one-dimensional objects known as strings.
- 678
- 1
- 5
- 12
-
Note that this is not true for composite objects like protons. – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Feb 08 '14 at 20:12