1

From the point of view of statistical thermodynamics, a single particle doesn't have a phase (state of matter), nor temperature.

What would happen if heat is transported to this single particle via radiation? How is this related to the same thing occurring for a mass of particles?

In addition, how can a single-molecule transistor, for example, depend on temperature via $f_{\alpha} = \left[ 1+\exp \left( \frac{\epsilon-\mu_{\alpha}}{k_B T} \right) \right]^{-1}$, if temperature is not even defined for a single molecule?

Sparkler
  • 3,184

3 Answers3

4

A single particle can be a 'system' within itself having modes depending on the particle ' s structure. These modes may be in 'tune' with the incident radiation and thus capture the energy which can increase the particle ' s momentum and therefore its velocity. We never say the particle's temperature has increased but rather it's momentum. When a system of particles absorb radiation, the increased momenta and higher mean velocity lead to the statistical measure of temperature.

docscience
  • 11,663
  • 2
  • 32
  • 69
1

Can a single particle be “heated” by radiation?

Not really, because heat is an emergent macroscopic property of an ensemble of particles. But since you put the word "heated" in quotes, we can allow a yes of sorts. Take a look at the Wikipedia temperature page, where we can see this picture:

enter image description here CCASA image by Greg L, see Wikipedia

It's to do with the kinetic theory of gases. A hot gas is one where the molecules are moving fast. And radiation will heat this gas. It will makes the molecules move faster. The simplest version of this is Compton scattering, see Rod Nave's hyperphysics:

enter image description here

The single particle is "heated" by radiation because a fast electron is a "hot" electron. Google it.

From the point of view of statistical thermodynamics, a single particle doesn't have a phase (state of matter), nor temperature.

Yes, but thermodynamics isn't just statistical dynamics. Look at the name and its etymology. "It was first spelled in a hyphenated form as an adjective (thermo-dynamic) in 1849 and from 1854 to 1859 as the hyphenated noun thermo-dynamics to represent the science of heat and motive power". Motive power. Motion.

What would happen if heat is transported to this single particle via radiation?

Its energy is increased. But this is kinetic energy rather than rest-mass energy.

How is this related to the same thing occurring for a mass of particles?

If the particles are confined inside a box, their kinetic energy is effectively rest-mass energy. They aren't actually at rest, but the average position of the particles with respect to you doesn't change. The mass of the system increases because of the added energy. A box full of fast-moving particles is harder to accelerate than a box full of slow-moving particles.

John Duffield
  • 11,097
  • fast and slow electrons are correct terminology only when not bound, no? 2) the box of fast moving particles would be moved as easily as slow moving particles (for example an empty gas tank and a full one), no?
  • – Sparkler Nov 10 '15 at 22:06
  • @Sparkler : people do refer to fast particles as "hot" particles. Check it out. And no, a box of fast moving particles is harder to move than a box full of slow-moving particles. I kid ye not. Try to imagine a box of full of gedanken bullets. When you push the box you have to accelerate all the bullets thataway. – John Duffield Nov 10 '15 at 22:12