3

The poynting vector is defined as

$\vec{S}=\mu_{0}^{-1}\vec{E}\times \vec{B}$

Taking the divergence of the poynting vector, one arrives at

$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{S}=-\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=0$

after some algebraic manipulation.

Note $u$ is the electromagnetic energy density.

The claim is that the $\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{S}$ is an energy flux density.

How do I see this is true?

Thanks in advance.

Physics Footnotes
  • 2,686
Physkid
  • 899
  • Hint: $u$ is not energy, is energy density. You have derived the continuity equation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_equation#Differential_form – Bosoneando Jun 13 '16 at 08:53
  • Indeed, I am aware that I have derived the continuity equation. And yes, $u$ was a mistake. Correction has been made, – Physkid Jun 13 '16 at 08:56
  • Or look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting%27s_theorem#Poynting.27s_theorem – Farcher Jun 13 '16 at 08:56
  • I have an insight. Clearly, I made the mistake of performing dimensional analysis on the left hand side. I could have just work on the right hand side. The right hand side has units of joules per unit volume. Taking the time derive once, a unit of time in second is introduced into the denominator. This gives joules per unit volume per second. However, it should, correctly be joules per unit area per unit time.. – Physkid Jun 13 '16 at 08:59
  • You need to concentrate on the work done by the field in any matter; add $\bf E\cdot J$ to complete the continuity equation. –  Jun 13 '16 at 09:02
  • I do not want to complete it. I want only to know how the units for the divergence of the Poynting vector works out to be $J/(m^{2}s)$ – Physkid Jun 13 '16 at 09:05
  • https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/17141/does-a-nonzero-poynting-vector-mean-that-there-is-propagation-of-energy – Cheng Dec 22 '22 at 11:56

1 Answers1

4

The converse is not a "theorem" in that you can't prove that it is true, even assuming Maxwell's equations as axioms. It is simply a "hunch" that $|\vec{S}|$ represents the power intensity and $U=\frac{1}{2}\,\epsilon\,|\vec{E}|^2+\frac{1}{2}\,\mu\,|\vec{H}|^2$ the energy density. What you can prove (and what you already understand) from Maxwell's equations is that:

  1. $\vec{S}$ is the flux of $U$ since the pair together fulfill a continuity equation in source free zones: where there are sources, the difference between $\vec{S}$ and the time rate of change of $U$ can be shown to be the rate of working of electric fields on currents (the $\vec{E}\cdot\vec{J}$ term);
  2. If $U$ integrated over all space can be defined (i.e. a convergent integral) then $U$ is constant if $\epsilon$ and $\mu$ are real (i.e. no absorbing materials) and there are no sources, or that its rate of change equals the rate of working of the $\vec{E}$ field (the integrated $\vec{E}\cdot\vec{J}$ term) if there are sources.

So the pair together behave exactly as an energy density and its flux vector ought to. We therefore postulate that they are the energy density and its flux vector and, so far, no experimental result has failed to agree with calculations made assuming this postulate.

Selene Routley
  • 88,112