-3

I have done some calculations to get relativistic mass and rest mass of a photon.
Are my calculations correct?
If Yes how much significance do they really have in physics?

This image has calculations for rest mass i.e m0

This image has calculations for relativistic mass

enter image description here

Sorry for I have written proton instead of photon in calculations . Hope you understand.

Java Rookie
  • 143
  • The answer you expect and the answer you get don't have to be the same. Many people tried to determine an upper limit for the photon mass and this paper discusses the actual methods used. – StephenG - Help Ukraine Sep 10 '17 at 14:34
  • The relativistic mass of the photon is very archaic and completely incorrect conception... I don't understand why did you waste your time... – Name YYY Sep 10 '17 at 15:16
  • 1
    We have MathJax active on the site so that you can typeset mathematic in a $\LaTeX$ math-mode-alike language. We strongly discourage photographed or scanned images of text because such content is neither searchable to editable. – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Sep 10 '17 at 16:38
  • Welcome to Physics! Welcome to Physics! Please note that we do have an equation editor built into the site, which can help improve readability of your post. – Kyle Kanos Sep 12 '17 at 10:17

1 Answers1

2

That would be true... if the photon did have $m_0$, but it actually doesn't.

Check that it makes no sense to have a particle with infinite mass. Instead, if you write $m_0=0$, then you get $0/0$, which is undetermined.

And you solve that using the other great formula. It's actually one of the key formulas of Sp.Rel.:

$E^2 =p^2 c^2 +m_o^2c^4$

For a photon, it's just $E^2 =p^2 c^2$ or $E=pc$, which does make sense. The energy is only due to momentum, and not due to rest mass. It depends on the frequency because $p=\hbar k$.

FGSUZ
  • 8,293