In comparing the electric field in gel electrophoresis to that of a parallel plate capacitor (PPC), what would be the difference between them? What I mean is, PPCs are known for their constant fields. Gel electrophoresis is accomplished by placing two electrodes into a buffer that contains a gel, which contains usually DNA.
Does the presence of the buffer medium complete the circuit in a "normal" sense, acting as a resistor of sorts. Or does it act as a medium between two plates, making it a weird PPC? The reason I ask is because I am having a hard time visualizing the path of the current through the liquid. If it really is the former, would the current take chaotic paths? The paths of particles in the medium are of course changing.
Electrophoresis occurs because of electrophoretic velocity differences between molecules. I.e. $v=\mu E$, where $\mu$ is the Henry equation. I'm currently looking into the differences between using PPCs to generate a constant electric field, and current electrophoresis methods.
I am mostly concerned about the strength of the field. I realize the field lines will probably be chaotic. Would the strength still be a simple calculation of $E = \frac{V}{d}$, with $d$ being the distance between the two electrodes?
The dielectric molecules would probably operate very similarly in both cases, right? I think they would align with both fields regardless. That is, assuming the electrophoresis method does not cause the field to be absolutely chaotic.
I apologize if my terminology is not the greatest. This is a very new area for me. Let me know if you have questions about any of my descriptions.
A video in case anyone is unfamiliar with what electrophoresis is. It's really cool!