0

There is a local performance on the equator of Uganda. In the southern hemisphere, which is more than ten meters away from the equator, after pouring a bucket of water, the water in the pool with holes at the bottom will rotate counterclockwise and discharge; In the Northern Hemisphere, which is more than ten meters away from the equator, after pouring a bucket of water, the water will be discharged clockwise; On the equatorial line, after pouring a bucket of water, the water in the pool will be discharged without rotation. Local people explained that this was caused by the rotation of the earth. Is this interpretation and performance correct?

I think they are wrong. It is impossible to carry out this kind of experiment in the washbasin. The direction of pouring water makes the water rotate counterclockwise and clockwise. The water-retaining ruler cannot stop the rotation of water for a short time. Their experiment is shown in this video.

enbin
  • 1,972

1 Answers1

3

It’s bogus. The period for a Coriolis-processing pendulum at latitude $\theta$ goes like $1/\sin\theta$, so the effect is weakest at the equator — that is, the period of the precession is very, very long. The suggestion that you could walk a few meters and see a different macroscopic effect is silly.

For a careful experiment, see these paired US/Australia videos which demonstrate the effect in two-meter kiddie pools.

rob
  • 89,569