By mentioning supernova in a question about cosmic rays, I'm assuming you mean supernova remnants, which are believed to be the predominant source of galactic cosmic rays, rather than the supernovae themselves which I don't believe are expected to produce cosmic rays (as the acceleration timescale of the particles is many thousands of years). Under such assumption, the answer is almost certainly not.
The primary reason is due to what is called the Hillas criterion, which states that the Larmor radius (or gyroradius, if you prefer) of the particle, $R_L= E/qB$, should not exceed the size of the accelerator. Hence, we can invert the relationship to show that,
$$E_\text{max}=qBR_\text{object}$$
Since a supernova remnant has a radius of $\sim10^{14}$ km and magnetic fields of a few microgauss, then the maximum energy ought to be in the TeV to PeV range. Once a particle exceeds that, it will leave the SNR and continue on its merry way at that energy (until it collides with a particle or with one of our space-based detectors).
In order to get to the GZK limit range (above EeV energies), you would need either an astoundingly large object (e.g., active galactic nuclei, gamma-ray bursts) or astoundingly large magnetic field (e.g., magnetars).