4

I was wondering about hydrostatic equilibrium (the balance of radially inward and outward forces) in large (i.e. above the Chandrasekhar limit) stars. It is often said that when the gravitational force exceeds any outward forces or pressures, mainly the electron degeneracy pressure I'm thinking, the star collapses into a black hole. But how can this happen without the Pauli exclusion principle being violated?

A similar question: Does black hole formation contradict the Pauli exclusion principle?

The answer by @Siva in that question makes some sense to me, but I don't understand at what point we start our counting of states from the object being a star to a black hole. What happens in the middle? Is there a sharp change?

hadsed
  • 239
  • 1
    There's more than one possible way to construe "right before an object turns into a black hole." There's the formation of the event horizon, which is usually taken to be the defining property of a black hole. There is also the formation of the singularity, or the point at which a particular infalling particle reaches the singularity. Which of these did you have in mind? But how can this happen without the Pauli exclusion principle being violated? What makes you think that the exclusion principle would be violated? –  Aug 31 '17 at 03:41
  • See https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/352935/why-can-a-neutron-star-implode?noredirect=1&lq=1 – ProfRob Aug 31 '17 at 07:05
  • and https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/173107/violation-of-pauli-exclusion-principle?noredirect=1&lq=1 – ProfRob Aug 31 '17 at 07:11

3 Answers3

2

When the force of gravity overcomes electron degeneracy, the electrons are effectively compressed into the nucleus where they are captured and bound by the nucleus (primarily protons) to form a large neutron mass. At this point, the star is even more dense and the process repeats as more electron-degenerate matter falls in and is bound. Meanwhile, energy is given off and this propels an inflationary pressure that can keep the star from collapsing instantly. Over time, the star cools and all remaining matter is bound by gravitation into a neutron star. This object is composed primarily of degenerate neutron matter. [Should the mass exceed 2-3 times the mass of our sun, this star will collapse into a black hole because gravity will overcome the neutron degeneracy pressure. Recall that neutrons, being fermions, cannot occupy the same energy state. Such a collapse is sudden and produces a supernova explosion from the energy transferred to outer layers by the energy released during collapse. This material can include heavier atoms than iron and seeds the surrounding space with the same stuff of which we and our rich planet are made.]

Rex
  • 29
  • 2
  • 1
    Hi Rex, you've really simplified here. It's not completely wrong but more details would be nice. Also, the Chandrasekhar limit is 1.4 solar masses. – Brandon Enright Apr 30 '14 at 03:50
  • Fermions can and do occupy the same energy state! – ProfRob Aug 31 '17 at 06:45
  • Neutron stars are really not supported by neutron degeneracy pressure. – ProfRob Aug 31 '17 at 07:16
  • @RobJeffries "Fermions can and do occupy the same energy state" How so? http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pauli.html " . Link please? – anna v Aug 31 '17 at 14:02
  • @annav That is appalling. The PEP forbids fermions occupying the same quantum state. Two fermions can have identical energy but different quantum numbers. That is what degeneracy means. – ProfRob Sep 01 '17 at 16:14
  • @RobJeffries of course one is talking of the same other quantum numbers, when using the Pauli exclusion. Your comment can be misunderstood by the non physicist, you should qualify it with the "if they have different other quantum numbers" – anna v Sep 01 '17 at 17:12
2

This answer expands on @Rex' s answer, so please read it to get the complete picture. It expands on the part elementary particles have in a black hole creation.

It is often said that when the gravitational force exceeds any outward forces or pressures, mainly the electron degeneracy pressure I'm thinking, the star collapses into a black hole. But how can this happen without the Pauli exclusion principle being violated? . . .

When the simple hydrogen equation does not hold because the potential has been distorted by the gravitational one, an electron can be captured by a proton. This makes a neutron and an electron neutrino. Neutrinos being weakly interacting escape and the neutrons make a neutron star which continues to collapse towards a black hole , if the mass is large enough. There is no problem with the Pauli exclusion or lepton number at this level. Neutrons are composed of quarks which are charged and also obey the Pauli exclusion principle. When the density due to the gravitational collapse becomes large then the whole will turn into a quark gluon plasma. That is as far as elementary particle interactions have taken us. Research is ongoing.

but I don't understand at what point we start our counting of states from the object being a star to a black hole. What happens in the middle? Is there a sharp change?

The point about a black hole is the total mass, such that it does not allow anything to escape from a certain radius. The quantum mechanical behavior from a certain point on is an effective theory joining quantum mechanics and gravitation, a process that is at the frontier of research. It depends on your definition of sharp. Supernovas are sharp.

Supernovae can be triggered in one of two ways: by the sudden reignition of nuclear fusion in a degenerate star; or by the gravitational collapse of the core of a massive star. In the first case, a degenerate white dwarf may accumulate sufficient material from a companion, either through accretion or via a merger, to raise its core temperature, ignite carbon fusion, and trigger runaway nuclear fusion, completely disrupting the star. In the second case, the core of a massive star may undergo sudden gravitational collapse, releasing gravitational potential energy that can create a supernova explosion.

anna v
  • 233,453
  • 1
    This reads as a random mishmash of thoughts without any logical structure, and it doesn't seem to answer the question. –  Aug 31 '17 at 03:44
  • @BenCrowell Maybe my english is at fault. This is not supposed to be a complete answer . but a partial one, to address the highlighted parts of the question because it would be too long for a comment. I had the impression my first sentence says this. It is not my fault it is upvoted in front of the more general answer. It is the peculiar voting system of this site . – anna v Aug 31 '17 at 04:03
  • This doesn't address the fundamental misunderstanding of the PEP. – ProfRob Aug 31 '17 at 07:16
-3

It's hard to bottle up quarks because they'll explode, they want to work with nuclear forces to be matter. So I say the singularity takes the degeneracy forces and nuclear forces with it and it becomes a powerful repulsive force bottled up. And a black hole is a bottle. And right after that neutron star collapsed, you don't say gravity won and nuclear forces lost. You say it's still an intense battle, gravity versus primordial matter repulsive forces pushing outward, and gravity is only winning at the moment by a score of 3 solar masses and 1 gram against 3 solar masses. A power struggle between primordial matter pushing out and gravity pushing down, a singularity ready to explode if only gravity's grip were released.

  • As proof that primordial matter carries all the degeneracy and nuclear forces with it are the 2 equilibrium dates before stages 1 and 2 stellar collapse, let's say at 2 solar masses and 3 solar masses, when outward and inward forces equal, then add 1 gram and nuclear/degeneracy forces retreat and hold position until the next equilibrium date, and after collapses the score on one date is 2 solar masses plus one gram gravity to 2 solar masses matter, then later 3 solar masses and 1 gram to 3 solar masses, nearly the same ratio but more repulsive force. – Mark Swartz Feb 25 '24 at 21:10