7

According to some resources I have you use the Dative case after a lot of verbs that mean an action pointed towards a person, like the "to gift" verb. For example:

Виктор мешает брату.
"брат" is in Dative case.

But at the same time I know that you use Accusative case for direct objects, i.e. the object of the action (and, subsequently, Dative for the indirect object). So in the example given above "брат" is clearly the direct object, so why isn't it in Accusative case? Is it just one of many "exceptions" that need to be remembered that go with the Dative, instead of the Accusative?

EDIT: Removed the "to hate" and "to love" verbs.

mathgenius
  • 385
  • 1
  • 10
  • 1
    "to hate" is definitely not supposed to be used with the dative case. Only accusative – d.k May 18 '16 at 23:07
  • 1
    "to hate" - ненавидеть (кого? что? - винительный падеж) – d.k May 18 '16 at 23:08
  • the same for "to love" – d.k May 18 '16 at 23:10
  • 1
    It's not an "exception", it's an indication that you need to altogether drop thinking in your current terms of "direct" and "indirect" objects. They're clearly not helping. – Nikolay Ershov May 19 '16 at 00:12
  • "hate", "love" - any examples? – Anixx May 19 '16 at 10:53
  • Wow, @NikolayErshov, thank you so much for that very helpful advise, it instantly cleared everything up for me. – mathgenius May 19 '16 at 13:36
  • You can be as sardonic as you like, but the answer you bested basically said the same thing. It was above all a case of trying to fill a cup that's already full. – Nikolay Ershov May 20 '16 at 03:30
  • @NikolayErshov I was sardonic, because you commend was all but helping. And, no, the answer I chose did nothing of the sort, what you did was say "your thinking is not right" which is extremely helpful and productive, the answer explained why my thinking was not right. – mathgenius May 20 '16 at 09:58
  • @ mathgenius To be honest Dative can also mean a perverted form of English "for". Victor is disturbing (mixing) for his brother (to his brother). Often the english word "for" works as a crude analog. – VCH250 May 23 '16 at 17:35

3 Answers3

7

The so called law about direct and indirect objects is good only to explain things post-factum. You cannot use the law to predict anything. Examples:

  • Виктор учит студентов физике. (Студенты is in accusative, физика is in dative)
  • Виктор преподаёт студентам физику. (Студенты is in dative, физика is in accusaive)

Note that Victor does the same thing in both cases.

You should just remember which verbs govern dative.

user31264
  • 8,579
  • 1
  • 26
  • 46
  • So, basically, Dative goes with certain verbs and all else is Accusative? – mathgenius May 19 '16 at 13:36
  • Yes, except that some verbs govern other cases, i. e. владеть governs instrumental, бояться governs genitive. Also, if a verb governs some case, the same verb with prefix governs the same case (i.e. since владеть governs instrumental, овладеть or завладеть also governs instrumental), don't know if there are any exceptions to this rule. – user31264 May 19 '16 at 16:22
  • @user31264 what about the prefixed verb научить with respect to учить; would it also require dative ? What about получить which does not require dative afterwards ? Would this qualify for an exception ? – Xavier Apr 30 '22 at 13:35
1

Виктор мешает брату. = Victor mixes [things] to his brother.

Мешает means mixes or messes. In this case the direct object is omitted. Victor mixes or messes some things with which his brother is doing something.

If you say Виктор мешает брата (accusative) this would mean Victor is mixing his brother. Like if he were cooking his brother in a pot.

Anixx
  • 14,542
  • 2
  • 32
  • 50
0

Это непереходные глаголы и они требуют дательного падежа. брату не direct object. Глагол мешать имеет два значения: Мешать что-то - переходный: Мешать кашу. Мешать кому-то - непереходный: Мешать брату. https://ru.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/мешать

Andrey Smirnov
  • 41
  • 2