44

After your death, you want to make sure that a special someone gets a vital piece of information (like the password to your bank account), but:

  1. You don't want anyone else to be able to get that information as long as you live.

  2. You only want a particular person to get that information.

How would you do it?

  • 5
    That's what wills and probate solicitors are for. Or are you specifically asking about other possibilities? Please clarify in your question if so, otherwise it's off-topic as per [FAQ]. Thanks! – TildalWave Jun 09 '13 at 04:29
  • @TildalWave, doesn't the use of a will imply that there are witnesses? – Maria Ines Parnisari Jun 09 '13 at 04:34
  • 1
    You can give your solicitor information (a key) how to retrieve information that's confidential, not necessarily confidential information itself. This key the solicitor has can be somehow linked to the person that will later use it. Say, a password or a key for a safe deposit box in a bank, where the person you'd like to entrust this information to is in the list of authorized people to access your safe deposit box contents. Essentially, you'd be looking for a specific multi-factor authentication after the fact. – TildalWave Jun 09 '13 at 04:40
  • 7
    All the answers have different assumptions, unnecessarily muddying the issue. What is your threat model? Are you afraid that those whom you bequeathe the information to will attempt to make use of it before your death? What is the risk of several of them conspiring against you? How soon do you want the information to pass to them? What are the losses if the information is revealed to them before your death? Ditto, is not revealed after you die? You have to be much more specific. – Deer Hunter Jun 11 '13 at 07:03
  • Make sure you know where the safe deposit box key is! –  Jun 30 '13 at 02:34

8 Answers8

23

A little more than a year ago, I was in a situation where I feared for my life. I gave this some thought and here's what I did.

I made a video recording containing everything I wanted people to know after I die, then I stored the video in a TrueCrypt volume and gave two copies to my two most trusted friends, and the password to my father and my then-girlfriend.

I told my dad and my then-girlfriend not to share the password with anybody, and told my trusted friends to share the file only with my dad and my then-girlfriend, and only after I die or after I'm reasonably believed to be dead (due to the nature of the danger, a sudden disappearance was a likely possibility).

The effectiveness of this arrangement comes from my trust in those people, a trust that has been built over many years. I've chosen this arrangement because I couldn't trust a purely automated solution. For example, I set up a Dead Man's Switch message that contained trivial to low-profile information, but at the time, there was a possibility that I'd disappear for weeks or months after which I could still be alive. In that period The Switch would have been activated.

Another solution is to hire a lawyer, draft your will, give him the password, and instruct him to share it only in the case of your death. This way, your password is safe by the power of the law (your lawyer can't breach the confidentiality, and even if he did, the files are with other people). Your lawyer has no access to the information, and your loved ones will get the password after your death.

samthebrand
  • 115
  • 1
  • 1
  • 5
Adi
  • 44,095
  • 16
  • 138
  • 170
  • 1
    Your first solution involves too many people. I liked the second one though. – Maria Ines Parnisari Jun 09 '13 at 06:21
  • 3
    @l19 If you give the password only to one person, and the file to another, the password/file could get lost/corrupted or the person might die before you. It's a matter involving my death, there's absolutely no way I could fix it, there's no second attempt. I had to be sure. Also, non of the involved people could get access to the secret information by themselves. – Adi Jun 09 '13 at 06:27
  • What if you use a password that works only on the first attempt, and just give it to the person you trust? – Maria Ines Parnisari Jun 09 '13 at 06:32
16

Google has set up a service called "Inactive Account Manager" which lets you specify certain trusted people who will get access to your account if it is inactive for a certain amount of time (for example, if you are dead). The inactivity period can be set anywhere from 3-18 months. See a screenshot below.

enter image description here

samthebrand
  • 115
  • 1
  • 1
  • 5
davidwebster48
  • 792
  • 3
  • 8
  • 17
  • You're in a car accident -> you fall into a coma for a month or so -> you awake from coma -> your account information has been shared with entrustee -> you wish you didn't awake from coma. 2) Your Google account is compromised -> You seek ways to fall into a coma. 3) It's Google FFS, do they really need to know everything about our lives even after we're dead? (no, I'm not paranoid, I'm just concerned we trust too much those we shouldn't and too little those we ought to).
  • – TildalWave Jun 09 '13 at 04:58
  • 1
    @TildalWave, you can open an additional account just for that. – Liran Orevi Jul 12 '13 at 15:08
  • @LiranOrevi - Please read answers in our Q&A on questions regarding web user identification, browser fingerprinting, anonymity,... You will fast appreciate it's a lot easier said than done. ;) – TildalWave Jul 12 '13 at 15:11
  • @TildalWave, are you saying that opening an additional Google account is hard? (Please refer to the comment, not the man who wrote it, which as far as I know you are not familiar with) – Liran Orevi Jul 12 '13 at 15:34
  • 1
    @LiranOrevi - I was referring to the comment, not sure where you got the impression from that this is in any way personal? I was implying there's ways to correlate two separate user accounts with a single individual, and there's plenty of "traps" an unsavvy user might not account for. Google is know to be doing this account correlation by design, and is apparent in other of their services as well (e.g. search results personalisations). The suggestion you go through answers discussing similar topics was merely for brevity of my comment, not to imply you lack understanding of this topic. – TildalWave Jul 12 '13 at 15:56