I'm trying to get the negated \approx sign in LaTeX, as it is in here:

But the \napprox command does not work. Any ideas? Maybe it was switched to a new command? Or do I just need to include some package?
I'm trying to get the negated \approx sign in LaTeX, as it is in here:

But the \napprox command does not work. Any ideas? Maybe it was switched to a new command? Or do I just need to include some package?
The table you show is relative to the symbols provided by mathabx. One can say
\usepackage{mathabx}
but this will change many symbols and not always in a desirable way.
For negated relations one can first try preceding the command by \not:
\not\approx
The placement of the diagonal bar is not always ideal, which is why the negation of \in has its own command \notin. In the case of \not\approx there is no problem.
Here's a visual comparison: above the normal rendition of the symbol, using Computer Modern Math Symbols, below the mathabx rendition. A difference in shape is evident.

Unless a font is used that contains the glyph ≉ (U+2249 NOT ALMOST EQUAL TO), the symbol is constructed by the two relational symbols \not and \approx. The appearance looks o.k., but the result from "copy & paste" is "suboptimal". This can be improved by package accsupp that uses the ActualText feature of PDF (for PDF viewers that support this feature such as Acrobat Reader):
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{accsupp}
\providecommand*{\napprox}{%
\BeginAccSupp{method=hex,unicode,ActualText=2249}%
\not\approx
\EndAccSupp{}%
}
\begin{document}
\[ a \napprox b \]
\end{document}
Result from "copy & paste" (AR9/Linux): a ≉ b
\BeginAccSupp and \EndAccSupp don't add items to the math list, so the spacing is correct (tested with a binary operator).
– egreg
May 31 '13 at 18:06
\pdfliteral or \special), no boxes. And I prefer \begingroup ... \endgroup for grouping. Curly braces for grouping would interfere by adding a subformula.
– Heiko Oberdiek
May 31 '13 at 21:30
$\not\approx$? – Corentin May 31 '13 at 14:51\napproxis defined by themathabxpackage – jub0bs May 31 '13 at 15:14amssymbwas created, space was at a premium, so negated relations that looked (and behaved) okay using\not\xxxweren't included. you can make your life a little easier by making your own definition:\newcommand{\napprox}{\not\approx}– barbara beeton May 31 '13 at 15:15