3

When clicking on the link in the footnote that should jump to the first appearances of a source, it is jumped to the first page of the document instead.

What I have so far:

.bib:

@inbook{HighfieldPosition_FourViews,
  author = {Highfield, R. },
  title = {God Controls by Liberating},
  pages = {141--164},
  year = 2011,
  crossref = "fourviewsdivineprovidence"
}


@inbook{CraigPosition_FourViews,
  author = {Craig, William Lane},
  title = {Response to Ron Highfield},
  pages = {165--175},
  year = 2011,
  crossref = "fourviewsdivineprovidence"
}

@book{fourviewsdivineprovidence,
  booktitle={Four Views on Divine Providence},
  author={Craig, W.L. and Highfield, R. and Boyd, G.A. and Helseth, P.K. and Jowers, D. and Gundry, S.N.}, 
  series={Counterpoints: Bible and Theology}, 
  year={2011},
  publisher={Zondervan}
}

in the text then:

blabla \autocite[143]{HighfieldPosition_FourViews}.
\end{quotation} blabla \autocite[175]{CraigPosition_FourViews}

The warning when compiling

pdfTeX warning (dest): name{cite.0:fourviewsdivineprovidence} has been referenc ed but does not exist, replaced by a fixed one

Output looks good but wrong link. The blue "cit" jumps to page "i" : enter image description here

What can I do to get the right page in the blue link?

Edit:

Here a complete example

\documentclass[a4paper, 11pt, oneside]{article} 



\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{csquotes}%
\usepackage[backend=biber,style=philosophy-verbose]{biblatex}

% http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/58040/25029
\renewbibmacro*{cite}{%
  \usebibmacro{cite:citepages}%
  \global\togglefalse{cbx:fullcite}%
  \global\togglefalse{cbx:loccit}%
  \bibhypertarget{cite\the\value{instcount}}{%
    \ifciteseen
      {\iffieldundef{shorthand}
        {\iffirstonpage% NEW
           {\usebibmacro{cite:name}% NEW
            \usebibmacro{cite:title}}% NEW
           {\ifciteibid
              {\usebibmacro{cite:ibid}}
              {\ifthenelse{\ifciteidem\AND\NOT\boolean{cbx:noidem}}
                 {\usebibmacro{cite:idem}}
                 {\usebibmacro{cite:name}}%
               \usebibmacro{cite:title}}%
%       \usebibmacro{cite:save}}% DELETED
        \usebibmacro{cite:save}}}% NEW
         {\usebibmacro{cite:shorthand}}}
      {\usebibmacro{cite:full}%
       \usebibmacro{cite:save}}}}



\addbibresource{Bibliography.bib}% Syntax for version >= 1.2  


% LAST PACKAGE == HYPERREF
% http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/16269/25029
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{urlcolor=blue, colorlinks=true}  % Colours hyperlinks in blue, but this can be distracting if there are many links.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\begin{document}


\newpage
asdasd
\newpage
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\autocite[143]{HighfieldPosition_FourViews}
\newpage
asdasd
yyyyyyyyyyy\autocite[175]{CraigPosition_FourViews}zzzzzzz
\newpage

%% ----------------------------------------------------------------
\label{Bibliography} 

\printbibliography[]


\end{document}
JoachimR
  • 347
  • Please add a minimal working example (MWE) that illustrates your problem. It will be much easier for us to reproduce your situation and find out what the issue is when we see compilable code, starting with \documentclass{...} and ending with \end{document}. – jub0bs Nov 07 '13 at 18:51
  • The redefinition from the answer in the link does seem to be quite specific to verbose-trad2. verbose-trad2 does have quite a lot of hyperlink stuff definition in the .cbx file, so there might be quite a lot of work involved to make it work with philosophy-verbose. – moewe Nov 07 '13 at 20:13
  • so no solution for philosophy-verbose so far? no workaround either? – JoachimR Nov 08 '13 at 07:10
  • I do not think it will be easy, simply beacuse you want the citation to link to a different citation of a different source. Plus, the output as you have in your screenshot is not helpful at all since the reader has no way of knowing what the "cit." refers to. How is (s)he to know that the "cit." refers to the last work something was cited in? – moewe Nov 08 '13 at 18:17
  • It is not a different source. Both citations are inbook that share the same book. The citation of footnote 14 displays an article within a book but also lists the whole book (therefore the "in ..") and the citation in footnote 15 only has to state "cit" meaning that the whole book can be found before – JoachimR Nov 08 '13 at 19:48
  • Quite so but where is "before"? in note 14 or 13, or 12? So implicitly the reader already has to know where what the whole book is. – moewe Nov 09 '13 at 07:47
  • Hmm you are right. Well "before" means footnote 14 but I see that noone can know that.. Shouldn't biblatex take care of it? Maybe I should add the book twice with two different keys and every inbook gets its own book? – JoachimR Nov 09 '13 at 20:16
  • Giving each inbook its own book even though the two books are identical kind of defeats the purpose of the crossref field, I would think. Since the problem technically persists without using the redefinition (\renewbibmacro*{cite}) you might want to contact the maintainer of philosophy-verbose directly. – moewe Nov 10 '13 at 15:53
  • thanks @moewe , I contacted the maintainer and if I don't get an answer, then I am going to use verbose-trad2 instead. – JoachimR Nov 12 '13 at 08:42
  • I have just checked and the problem seems solved. I don't get an error any more. Can we assume that a update in biblatex-philosophy solved your troubles? – moewe Oct 01 '15 at 06:56
  • The maintainer never replied and at this time I am not able to compile my project. Maybe my request has been taken seriously without notifying me, but I can not confirm. If it works for you now then fine. – JoachimR Oct 01 '15 at 07:35
  • That is interesting. Can you make sure to update to the newest versions, run this MWE later and update your post if there are any changes you get in output now? – moewe Oct 01 '15 at 09:42
  • 4
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the problem cannot be reproduced with a recent version of biblatex and biblatex-philosophy. – moewe Dec 30 '15 at 08:19

0 Answers0