1

With the following MWE:

\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{intersections} %% named intersections
\usetikzlibrary{fit}
\usetikzlibrary{calc}


\begin{document}

\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{axis}[
  width= 400pt,
  ymin = 0,
  ymax = 5,
  xmin = 0,
  xmax = 7,
  xtick = {0,1,...,7},
  scaled x ticks=real:2324823,
  xtick scale label code/.code={}, % this to not show extra scale label
]

\addplot [] coordinates {(0,0)};

\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

... I'm getting xtick label formatting like this:

test_pdf

I would prefer less spacing between the numbers and the central dot - this is the previous image edited in Gimp to show my preference:

test_pdf2

Is this possible to do somehow - maybe through some settings for /pgf/number format/sci?

sdaau
  • 17,079
  • 1
    Instead of reducing the space (which gives inconsistent result), you can rotate them: x tick label style={inner xsep=0pt,rotate=45,anchor=north east},. –  Feb 18 '14 at 01:25
  • 3
    As @HarishKumar notes, reducing the space will give inconsistent results. But if you really need to do it, adding \pgfkeys{/pgf/number format/sci generic={mantissa sep={\!\cdot\!},exponent={10^{#1}}}} inside the tikzpicture environment will do the trick. Adjust the spacing/kerning commands around the \cdot to your liking. – Paul Gessler Feb 18 '14 at 01:36
  • Thanks @HarishKumar - in this case, I'd rather not rotate the labels (although I do that kind of stuff often). I found a "manual" way, posted it below - I don't think it looks that bad... Cheers! – sdaau Feb 18 '14 at 01:41
  • Thanks @PaulGessler - that is exactly what I need; I've just learned a manual way to do that, and I've posted it below. Tried your suggestion and it automatizes it! If you don't mind posting that as answer, I will accept it; thanks again, cheers! – sdaau Feb 18 '14 at 01:45

2 Answers2

2

Based on my comment:

As @HarishKumar notes, reducing the space will give inconsistent results. Scientific notation in the text of your document will not look the same, and in general it's not a good idea to fiddle with TeX's spacing recommendations. The \cdot is spaced out because it is a binary operator.

But if you really need to do it, you may add
[/pgf/number format/sci generic={mantissa sep={\!\cdot\!},exponent={10^{#1}}}]
to the tikzpicture options, as shown in the complete code below.

Alternatively, you can use braces around \cdot to override TeX's default operator spacing:
[/pgf/number format/sci generic={mantissa sep={{{\cdot}}},exponent={10^{#1}}}]
The extra set of braces is required to prevent the keyval system from treating the braces as another nesting level.

You may, of course, further adjust the spacing/kerning commands around the \cdot to your liking.

The code

\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{pgfplots}

\begin{document}

% Choose either one of the following two lines
%\begin{tikzpicture}[/pgf/number format/sci generic={mantissa sep={\!\cdot\!},exponent={10^{#1}}}]
\begin{tikzpicture}[/pgf/number format/sci generic={mantissa sep={{{\cdot}}},exponent={10^{#1}}}]
\begin{axis}[
  width= 400pt,
  ymin = 0,
  ymax = 5,
  xmin = 0,
  xmax = 7,
  xtick = {0,1,...,7},
  scaled x ticks=real:2324823,
  xtick scale label code/.code={}, % this to not show extra scale label
]

\addplot [] coordinates {(0,0)};

\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}

The output

enter image description here

Paul Gessler
  • 29,607
1

Well, thanks to these questions:

... at least I found a manual way to do it - by manually typing and overriding xticklabels at the end of the axis setup:

...
  xtick scale label code/.code={}, 
  xticklabels={$0$, $4.3{\cdot}\!10^{-7}$, $8.6{\cdot}\!10^{-7}$, $1.29{\cdot}\!10^{-6}$, $1.72{\cdot}\!10^{-6}$, $2.15{\cdot}\!10^{-6}$, $2.58{\cdot}\!10^{-6}$, $3.01{\cdot}\!10^{-6}$ },
]
...

... which results with:

test_pdf

... which doesn't look bad at all - but who wants to type this kind of stuff manually :)

So if there's some automatic way to wrap the \cdot and add a negative math skip \! after it, that would be great to know...

Community
  • 1
sdaau
  • 17,079
  • 1
    You could pass \medmuskip=0em to every tick label. Or (I think better) write the labels like 1.72, 2.15, 2.58, etc. and on the side, a general {}\cdot 10^{-6}. – Manuel Feb 18 '14 at 02:11
  • 2
    @sdaau: You can save yourself the typing work by using the approach Paul Gessler described in his comment: Calling \pgfkeys{/pgf/number format/sci generic={mantissa sep={\!\cdot\!},exponent={10^{#1}}}} somewhere before the \begin{axis}. – Jake Feb 18 '14 at 06:53
  • Thanks @Jake - I was hoping @PaulGessler would have posted his comment as an answer, so I can accept it :) ; thanks @Manuel for the tip too ... Cheers! – sdaau Feb 18 '14 at 09:54
  • Sorry for the delay; my answer is there now! I wanted to do a bit of research to make a more comprehensive answer. :-) – Paul Gessler Feb 19 '14 at 14:44