My question is similar to this one but I understand the behavior described there and am interested in best practices in cases like the following.
Typically, when ending an environment like quote in the body of my documents, I've always left a blank line after the environment (it improves code readability for me to separate environments from the main text in this way) and suppressed the paragraph indentation with \noindent. Like so:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Some body text. Let's introduce a quote:%
%
\begin{quote}
Some quote text.
\end{quote}
\noindent Some text following the quote.
\end{document}
Now, I recently realized (no idea why it took me so long) that I could simply comment out the empty line and save myself from littering a bunch of \noindents all over my document. So now I do this:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Some body text. Let's introduce a quote:%
%
\begin{quote}
Some quote text.
\end{quote}
%
Some text following the quote.
\end{document}
What I am interested in now is whether there are any substantive differences between the two approaches given above that might lead me to prefer one over the other (this is in the spirit of some of my recent questions like inline math or \textit for author defined math constants). Are there?
\noindentbut this should be a very rare thing to need to do. – David Carlisle Mar 18 '14 at 12:26\noindentthen it's available for that use. But it's like using\textbf{\large my title}instead of a proper sectioning command it sort of half works and it's legal latex, but by the time you take care of indentation and disallowing page break after the head, and getting consistent spacing, in 999 times out of 1000 it's simpler to use the standard command. – David Carlisle Mar 18 '14 at 12:40