9

The example for the forloop package is \newcounter{ct}\forloop{ct}{1}{\value{ct} < 5}{\arabic{ct}}. I need to compare two counters having the first run up to the second. <= doesnt work, neither does \leq or ...+1. I know I can solve it with \not or \or, but those are workarounds. How does it really work?

  1. Can I and if so how can I do a "real" <=?
  2. Can I and if so how can I use formulas (like \value{a}<\value{b}+1)?
Stefan Kottwitz
  • 231,401
peter
  • 2,895

2 Answers2

10

  1. No. It is based on TeX's \ifnum, and only <, =, > is supported.

  2. Use eTeX primitive \numexpr:

    \newcounter{ct} \forloop{ct}{1}{\value{ct} < \numexpr\value{page}+10}{\arabic{ct} }

    Or you can use etoolbox package (looks awful for this simple bool expression, I agree):

    \newcounter{ct}
\setcounter{ct}{1}
\whileboolexpr{test {\ifnumcomp{\value{ct}}<{\value{page}+10}}}
  {\arabic{ct} \stepcounter{ct}}
Leo Liu
  • 77,365
  • 2
    In the first case, you may want to add \relax to be sure to end \numexpr at the right place (\numexpr will remove it). Otherwise, \numexpr may end up trying to expand some code which is placed after that argument. It turns out that \ifthenelse has a \relax at the right place, but I wouldn't rely on that. – Bruno Le Floch May 01 '11 at 06:09
6

The expl3 programming package allows you to use extended comparison operators including <= and so on; there's a few ways to perform your specific task here (e.g., also see \prg_stepwise_inline:nnnn), but here's one example that uses the ‘do while’ method explicitly:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{expl3}
\begin{document}
\ExplSyntaxOn
\int_new:N \ct
\int_set:Nn \ct {10}

\bool_while_do:nn
  { \int_compare_p:n { \ct <= 17 } }
  {
    [ \int_use:N \ct ]
    \int_incr:N \ct
  }
\ExplSyntaxOff
\end{document}
Will Robertson
  • 73,872