I am using the package sfmath. It is rather hard to explain why, but the reason should not matter for my question. If it is required I can try to explain why I need sfmath. Nevertheless, the main message is that it can not be turned off.
Although I am using sfmath, I do would like to use the typical "a" in the mathmode of amsmath. How can I achieve this?
Is it possible to change the font style for single words/letter such that I, per command, can change the font style locally when required?
For illustration purposes a simple working example looks like this:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{sfmath}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
a = a
\end{equation}
\end{document}
sfmath seems to be overruling amsmath as it does not produce the "a" that I would like. The code above results in:

Whereas the lower "a = a" is obtained by turning off sfmath in order to illustrate the "a" that I would like to include.
Thank you very much!

amsmathproduces. I am not sure how to alter the answer of the link you gave me to my specific case. – The Dude Jun 24 '14 at 15:05\documentclassand end with\end{document}.) – cfr Jun 24 '14 at 21:13sfmathis a package that provides a certain sans-serif font for math mode, this is not the purpose ofamsmath. The macros and environments of theamsmathpackage are compatible with all sorts of font families, including those provided bysfmath. Thus, it doesn't make much sense to say thatamsmathoverrulessfmath, or vice versa. Are you really looking to use the serif-styleaof either Computer Modern Roman or Computer Modern math italics instead of the sans-serifathat's activated whensfmathis loaded? – Mico Jun 25 '14 at 09:38sfmathis active I want to use the font ofsfmath. However I want to locally be able to use the "a" as produced byamsmath(lower "a" in the figure included). – The Dude Jun 25 '14 at 10:02amsmathdoes not "produce", or otherwise make available, any particular font. – Mico Jun 25 '14 at 13:03amsmathleft aside. How can I locally change the font of my "a" to the one at the bottom of the included image? – The Dude Jun 25 '14 at 14:24