I am unsatisfied with the way subscript is rendered for the Greek letter \chi. This particular letter is rendered with a small downward offset.
I occasionally have to prefix the subscript with \sciptscriptstyle such that, in effect, an expression may look like
\sup{\chi_{\scriptscriptstyle A_n}(x)}[n]
where
\RenewDocumentCommand{\sup}{m O{}}{
\operatorname{sup}\ifstrempty{#2}{}{\limits_{\mathclap{\substack{\expandafter{\scriptscriptstyle{#2}}}}}}
\expandafter{#1}
}
(I admit this snippet is a little messy, especially due to the uncanonical declaration of the optional argument as O{} and testing via \ifstrempty instead of o for the argument type and IfNoValueTF--using the xparse package. I am not entirely clear yet about what syntax is more straightforward.)
Is there a way to redefine \chi keeping the syntax in line with all semantically equivalent concepts, i.e., letters, but having only \chi's subscript expressions smaller or slightly lower? To clarify, I am thinking of redefining the subscript operator _ for \chi only. But I naively suppose TeX' grammar would not let me do that.
An evident work-around would involve defining a new macro using a different syntax like
\newcommand{\Chi}[1]{\chi_{\scriptscriptstyle{#1}}}
So effectively, what I want is just
\chi_{expr}
where expr is rendered smaller or offset lower than default.




\chia slight distance vertically higher (all the time, not just with subscripts). While messing with a designer's fonts is not ideal, the alternative you propose of setting different size subscripts at the same nesting level could be very confusing. – Steven B. Segletes Jul 15 '14 at 11:06$\chi_{\textscit A_n}? The problem is not so much with the letter chi than with capital letters in subscripts. Or you might define a new math alphabet with italic smallcaps, and usemathchoiceto use this new alphabet in (sub)subscripts. – Bernard Jul 15 '14 at 11:13\chi, changing it may seem confusing to some readers. – user59118 Jul 15 '14 at 11:17\chi_{\bigcup_{j \in \mathbb{N}} A_j}. – user59118 Jul 15 '14 at 11:20@-commands but I'll read it up insource2e(http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/59402/59118) to try to understand the answers to the questions cited. – user59118 Jul 15 '14 at 11:28\chi^{}_{A}will haveAslightly lower than in\chi_{A}, which might be what you want. – egreg Jul 15 '14 at 14:00\supin this. – egreg Jul 15 '14 at 17:48