I'd like my log axis to have a reasonable number of tick labels which correspond to "nice" numbers. For example, 1-2-5-10 are nearly a geometric series, so they are about equally spaced on the log axis.
I tried the style log ticks with fixed point and it does stupid stuff like below:

The first axis has not enough labels, leaving huge amounts of space between them. The second axis has chosen to put major ticks halfway between powers of ten -- e.g. square roots of (.001, .01, .1), and doesn't have that telltale logarithmic tick spacing, so readers are unlikely to even notice it is a log scale.
These both look bad. I also tried
extra x ticks={0.02,0.05,0.1,0.2,0.5,1,2,5,10,20,50,100},
extra x tick label={ \pgfmathfloatparsenumber{\tick} \pgfmathfloatexp{\pgfmathresult} \pgfmathprintnumber{\pgfmathresult} },
xticklabels={},
which comes close

but there are still a couple problems. The labels aren't centered correctly on the ticks, and the right-hand graph is still putting ticks at sqrt(0.001, 0.01, 0.1). And the extra ticks look like major ticks, which isn't really a problem but isn't ideal either.
I do realize that this data range doesn't really need a log scale, it's in the middle region that could go either way. I'm using log for consistency with other data that spans over three decades.
How can I get the proper minor ticks and labels?
Complete MWE
\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usepgfplotslibrary{groupplots}
\usepgfplotslibrary{statistics}
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.9}
\begin{document}
\pgfplotsset{
S/.style={
xmode=log,
log ticks with fixed point,
ytick={1,2}
},
}
\resizebox{.9 \columnwidth}{!}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\begin{groupplot}[S,
group style={columns=2},
boxplot/draw direction=x,
]
\nextgroupplot[title={90th Percentile Error}]
\addplot+[boxplot] table[header=false,row sep=\\,y index=0] {
0.101411 \\ 0.072893 \\ 0.093314 \\ 0.075811 \\ 0.080916 \\ 0.063481 \\ 0.092617 \\ 0.113238 \\ 0.093469 \\ 0.073329 \\ 0.081212 \\ 0.092889 \\ 0.088329 \\ 0.096120 \\
};
\addplot+[boxplot] table[header=false,row sep=\\,y index=0] {
1.032139 \\ 0.791053 \\ 0.659514 \\ 0.700048 \\ 0.523935 \\ 0.779241 \\ 0.891047 \\ 0.626462 \\ 1.141396 \\ 0.959789 \\ 1.110311 \\ 1.205517 \\ 1.058122 \\ 1.278061 \\ 0.801587 \\
};
\nextgroupplot[title={Mean Absolute Error}]
\addplot+[boxplot] table[header=false,row sep=\\,y index=0] {
0.051834 \\ 0.037930 \\ 0.057205 \\ 0.037753 \\ 0.033726 \\ 0.030318 \\ 0.046359 \\ 0.056751 \\ 0.036272 \\ 0.038457 \\ 0.039852 \\ 0.040726 \\ 0.047210 \\ 0.047129 \\ 0.042315 \\ 0.052287 \\ 0.048230 \\ 0.044014 \\ 0.039751 \\ 0.059421 \\ 0.043587 \\ 0.035238 \\ 0.039131 \\ 0.034533 \\ 0.045348 \\ 0.037391 \\ 0.048204 \\
};
\addplot+[boxplot] table[header=false,row sep=\\,y index=0] {
0.334964 \\ 0.316966 \\ 0.269175 \\ 0.251022 \\ 0.225320 \\ 0.245171 \\ 0.322015 \\ 0.281091 \\ 0.367715 \\ 0.336092 \\ 0.375951 \\ 0.467985 \\ 0.407952 \\ 0.289091 \\
};
\end{groupplot}
\end{tikzpicture}
}
\end{document}


groupplotuses no\begin{axis}I'm usingxmode=loginstead ofsemilogxaxis. – Ben Voigt Oct 25 '14 at 13:37log ticks with fixed pointscale will ever need. If you have some many decades that the labels run together, simply switch to 1-10-100 (one per decade). And if the plot has so few decades that more ticks are needed, it probably makes sense as linear, not logarithmic, anyway. Some of my own plots span three decades, the ones with less than 2 decades could use linear scale; I'm using log only for consistency. – Ben Voigt Oct 25 '14 at 17:01log ticks with fixed pointcurrently affects the number format, not the choice of tick positions. It might make sense to allow more presets of tick positions, but that is a different story. – Christian Feuersänger Oct 25 '14 at 17:47log ticks with fixed pointdoesn't currently affect choice of tick positions, I doubt anyone is very happy with the results it currently gives for intra-decade ticks. I suspect the best behavior would be an alternate preset for tick spacing, that activates by default when fixed point is turned on? – Ben Voigt Oct 25 '14 at 18:17log ticks with fixed pointis useless. But I still see a need to define what is the correct solution. Perhaps we should discuss this outside of this Q&A forum; maybe mail is a good idea. My address is on top of the pgfplots manual. – Christian Feuersänger Oct 25 '14 at 18:31