This may be an attribute of the PDF specification and viewer, since you're not even including hyperref. That is, when you have something of the form <possibly something>@<something>.<something>, it's interpreted as an email (without the @, perhaps a website). An effective way I've been able to remove this automated interpretation is to create a space at some inconspicuous location within the string-in-question. Somewhat similar to writing {author1,author2}@example .com. For example, using
Email: \{homer, lisa\}@thesimpsons\hspace{0.125em}.com}% Remove hyperlink from email
If you try this yourself, you'll note that using a space of only 0.12em doesn't remove the hyperlink when viewed in Adobe Reader, suggesting that TeX is not involved here.
Another option would be to insert some non-link-related content. Below I've made \emaildot which is a scaled-down version of \textbullet, simulating a .:

\documentclass[conference]{ieeetran}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\newcommand{\emaildot}{\makebox[0.2em]{\scalebox{.23}{\textbullet}}}
\title{A title}
\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Michael Shell}
\IEEEauthorblockA{School of Electrical and\\
Computer Engineering\\
Georgia Institute of Technology\\
Atlanta, Georgia 30332--0250\\
Email: mshell@ece.gatech.edu}
\and
\IEEEauthorblockN{Homer Simpson}
\IEEEauthorblockA{Twentieth Century Fox\\
Springfield, USA\\
Email: \{homer, lisa\}@thesimpsons\emaildot com}% Remove hyperlink from email
\and
\IEEEauthorblockN{James Kirk\\
and Montgomery Scott}
\IEEEauthorblockA{Starfleet Academy\\
San Francisco, California 96678-2391\\
Telephone: (800) 555--1212\\
Fax: (888) 555--1212}}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\end{document}
The contact information above, as an example, was taken from the IEEEtran documentation.
The above method is similar to the suggestion in Obfuscation of @ and . in e-mail addresses. Somewhat different, but similar.
hyperrefthere will be no real link in the PDF document, which is how much you can get, because anybody opening the PDF with a previewer having those heuristics will see a link. – egreg Nov 19 '14 at 14:46