I'd like to put enumerate on a new line, but cannot use \newline because there is no line to end!
Here is the code:
\newtheorem*{quoz}{Teoremi del quoziente}
\begin{quoz} % \newline here does not work
\begin{enumerate}
\item Se $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} |f(x)| = +\infty$ allora $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} \frac1{f(x)} = 0$.
\item Se $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} f(x) = 0$ allora $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} \frac1{|f(x)|} = +\infty$.
\item Se $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} f(x) = l$ allora $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} \frac1{f(x)} = \frac1l$.
\item Se $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} f(x) = l$ e $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} g(x) = m \neq 0$, allora $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac lm$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{quoz}
Currently the problem is that the first point starts where the theorem's title is. I find it kind of ugly. Is there a way to make it start after a new line?
I tried doing
\begin{quoz}$ $\newline
\begin{enumerate}
%...
But that adds too much space and feels like a hack. Is there a better way?
EDIT: I discovered that for some weird reason this works
\begin{quoz}$ $
\begin{enumerate}
%...
I don't get why because $ $ should be inline... Nevertheless, is there a better way?

\leavevmodedo? – Manuel Feb 02 '15 at 13:03undefined control sequence. Is it defined in some package? – rubik Feb 02 '15 at 13:05\leavevmodeis basic TeX (no package required). – Steven B. Segletes Feb 02 '15 at 13:08\leavevmodeshould work. As anything that starts a paragraph like\,~,\mbox{}, ... – Ulrike Fischer Feb 02 '15 at 13:09v, what a stupid mistake. – rubik Feb 02 '15 at 13:14\mbox{}etc, it is the wrong way really. You have not shown how you definedquozbut fro exampleamsthmif you are using that has abreakstyle that puts a linebreak after the heading. – David Carlisle Feb 02 '15 at 13:33quozis just\newtheorem*{quoz}{Teoremi del quoziente}– rubik Feb 02 '15 at 13:33\newtheorem, one in latex itself and different ones in the packagestheorem,ntheorem,amsthmto name a few. It's always best to include a complete small document that demonstrates the problem, so peolple can adapt it in answers. – David Carlisle Feb 02 '15 at 13:35amsthm. – rubik Feb 02 '15 at 13:39$l\ne0$in the third item. – egreg Feb 02 '15 at 13:56