Conflict with limit , font, babel

Question

I have the following code

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[spanish]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{gfsartemisia-euler}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
$$\lim_{t\to a}{f(t)}$$
\end{document}

and the result is

I found that removing \usepackage[spanish]{babel} the problem is solved, but I need to write in spanish and I like the font. are there some code like \usetikzlibrary{babel} which allows to use tikz and spanish together (\usetikzlibrary{babel} allows to use <-> in draws with spanish babel)

@Manuel genius!! it works!, LaTeX has multiple and unknowed commands for everything. — L F, May 16 '15 at 14:30

score 6 · Accepted Answer · answered May 16 '15 at 14:35

6

If you move \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} to before \usepackage[spanish]{babel} you get something that looks sort of correct, is this what you want?

Spanish

MWE:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[spanish]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{gfsartemisia-euler}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
$$\lim_{t\to a}{f(t)}$$
\end{document}

answered May 16 '15 at 14:35

Question: What does ´\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}´? because in Font Catalogue : http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/gfsartemisia-euler/ says add both, – L F May 16 '15 at 14:39
I think \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} provides more detailed fonts. This thread: (http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/664/why-should-i-use-usepackaget1fontenc) says that it adds more glyphs to the available characters. For example, without fontenc, the letter ö is created by putting dots over the letter o while with the package, there is an actual glyph for ö. Short story: the fonts are ugly without fontenc, according to my experience. – May 16 '15 at 14:52

score 2 · Answer 2 · answered May 16 '15 at 14:34

Spanish babel offers a switch to have accented or unnacented operators (lim/lím, max/máx, min/mín, inf/ínf, mod/mód, etc.). It seems to work with the switch

\unaccentedoperators

In any case, I would wait for another answer because this just removes the addition made by babel leaving the original unaccented operators. There seems to be a problem with the accent char in a certain font loaded by gfsartemisia-euler, and it would be better to get an answer that does solve the problem (so you can have freedom between accented or unaccented operators).

Conflict with limit , font, babel

2 Answers2