I'd like the output of BibTeX or BibLaTeX to be a inline bibliography (with entries separated e.g. just with bullets, see example below) avoiding the common list-based format. This is needed for posters. Usually I just copy-paste and then adapt the whole bibliography, but that's painstaking and error-prone. Any ideas?
Here's some MWE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[
natbib=true,
style=numeric,
backend=biber,
]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{references.bib}
\begin{filecontents}{references.bib}
@article{Smith:01,
author = {Smith, John},
year = {2001},
title = {Article title},
journal = {Journal title},
volume = {13},
pages = {1--2}
}
@book{Mueller:02,
author = {M{\"u}ller, Hans},
year = {2002},
title = {Book title},
publisher = {Publisher},
address = {Address}
}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{document}
\cite{Smith:01}, \cite{Mueller:02}
\section*{``Flat'' bibliography}
Hans M\"uller. \textit{Book title}. Address: Publisher, 2002. \raisebox{0.2ex}{$\bullet$} John Smith. ``Article title'' . In: Journal title 13 (2001), pp. 1--2.
\printbibliography
\end{document}

Edit: Note that the "flat"/inline bibliography should also contain the numeric labels.


\documentclass{...}and ending with\end{document}. – Jun 14 '15 at 13:53biblatexterms) what bibliography style you require; and (3) some code to save people from needing to make assumptions that may be incorrect and/or uncalled for. – jon Jun 14 '15 at 14:43flatmeansinline, one short reference after another one? Actually, I wondered too – Jun 14 '15 at 15:00biblatexdefines bibliography styles with\listin\defbibenvironment{bibliography}. That's why I called it list-based. As for "flat", I'd be grateful to learn the properbiblatexterm. I don't like "flat" very much either. – Timm Jun 14 '15 at 15:51