0

I am writing a document where I am forced to insert citations of relevant bibliography as footnotes. I am using a similar text for comparison, and I noticed that the bibliography style is rather compact:

As it is shown in [1], $2=1$; compare also [2] for a more
combinatorial proof of this result. 

[...] 

Remember that the main theorem in [1,2] entail that $2=1$; [3] 
aims to apply this result to a statement equivalent to RH (see [4]).

=========
[1]: N. True; "A simple proof of something false" (1989). 
[2]: A. Las; "A difficult proof of something false" (2001).
[3]: T. Kyle; "You could have proved something better than this" (2002).

When referring again to [1], only a superscript with the corresponding footnote where it has been cited the first time is printed. I think this is done with clever cross-referencing and a bit of biblatex magic, but my bib-fu is rather poor, so I'm not able to backward-engineer the pdf to understand how this is done.

I tried by simply juggling with styles in biblatex options, to no avail.


Edit: I produced a MWE:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{filecontents,lipsum}
\usepackage[style=verbose-ibid,backend=bibtex]{biblatex}

\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@article{ntrue,
  title={A simple proof of something false},
  author={N. True},
  journal={Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra},
  volume={9},
  number={2},
  pages={207--220}
}

@article{alas,
    AUTHOR = {A. Las},
     TITLE = {A difficult proof of something false},
   JOURNAL = {J. Homotopy Relat. Struct.},
    VOLUME = {2},
      YEAR = {2007},
    NUMBER = {2},
     PAGES = {295--314},
   MRCLASS = {18E40 (18D30)},
  MRNUMBER = {2369170 (2008m:18023)}
}

@article{tkyle,
    AUTHOR = {T. Kyle},
     TITLE = {You could have proved something better than this},
   JOURNAL = {Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.},
  FJOURNAL = {Transactions of the American Mathematical Society},
    VOLUME = {353},
      YEAR = {2001}
}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
As it is shown in [\footcite{ntrue}], $$2=1.$$ compare also [\footcite{alas}] for a more
combinatorial proof of this result. 

\lipsum[3]

Remember that the main theorem in [\footcite{ntrue}, \footcite{alas}] entail that $2=1$; [\footcite{tkyle}] aims to apply this result to a statement equivalent to RH.
\end{document}

I want that the second reference \footcite{ntrue} points to footnote 1. Obviously (if possible) without defining a command which refers to a footnote (this forces me to keep track of each occurrence of each key, and note manually who's the first: it can be done, but...)

fosco
  • 1,253

0 Answers0