Hm, very unusual request ... however if you persist, try
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\begin{document}
\begin{subequations}
\begin{tabularx}{\hsize}{@{}XXXc@{}}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:UBCs_D100}
Re = \frac{U L}{\nu}, \notag
\addtocounter{equation}{1}
\end{equation} &
\begin{equation}\label{eq:UBCs_D200}
Ha = B L \sqrt{\frac{\sigma}{\rho \nu}}, \notag
\addtocounter{equation}{1}
\end{equation} &
\begin{equation} \label{eq:UBCs_N00} \notag
Re_m = \mu_{m} \sigma U L
\end{equation}
& (\ref{eq:UBCs_D100},\ref{eq:UBCs_D200},\ref{eq:UBCs_N00})
\end{tabularx}
\end{subequations}
\begin{equation} \label{eq:UBCs_N100}
a = b
\end{equation}
From above code you should catch idea, how to manage your problem. I didn't bother with formatting as you not provide MWE (which can be compiled).

Edit:
An another solution with better formatting of equations. Here instead tabularx is used minipages aligned at their bottom:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\begin{document}
\begin{subequations}
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0pt}
\noindent\begin{minipage}{0.28\hsize}
\begin{equation}[b]\label{eq:UBCs_D100}
Re = \frac{U L}{\nu}, \notag
\addtocounter{equation}{1}
\end{equation}
\end{minipage}\begin{minipage}[b]{0.28\hsize}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:UBCs_D200}
Ha = B L \sqrt{\frac{\sigma}{\rho \nu}}, \notag
\addtocounter{equation}{1}
\end{equation}
\end{minipage}\begin{minipage}[b]{0.28\hsize}
\vskip-5pt
\begin{equation} \label{eq:UBCs_N00} \notag
Re_m = \mu_{m} \sigma U L
\end{equation}
\end{minipage}
\hfill(\ref{eq:UBCs_D100},\ref{eq:UBCs_D200},\ref{eq:UBCs_N00})
\end{subequations}
\begin{equation} \label{eq:UBCs_N100}
a = b
\end{equation}
\end{document}
Result:

Interestingly, both solution only works with equation environment. At use of gather or other amsmath environments the sub-equations labels are lost.