Why is it that after \right), the . placed after it is spaced. It looks disturbing.
For example:
\begin{equation}
\left(x+y=z\right).
\end{equation}
There exists an automatic slight space between ) and . that I would like to get rid of if possible?
EDIT:
Here is a better example,
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
4x+y-z =& \left( \int_3^7 dr+ \right. \\
& \left. y+x\mathcal{M} \right).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
What has been discussed in the comments, is to define \usepackage{mleftright} though without an application, things are still a little difficult to understand.


\!, or if one needs a finer measure,\mkern-#mu, where#is replaced with a decimal value. Welcome to the site. – Steven B. Segletes Aug 13 '15 at 11:05\mkern-\nulldelimiterspaceis also useful to you. – 1010011010 Aug 13 '15 at 11:07\left(...\right)becomes inner atom, which is different from plain(...)with respect to spacing around it. See this question for more detail. – Merzong Aug 13 '15 at 11:11\left<fence>and after\right<fence>, load themleftrightpackage and use\mleftand\mrightinstead of\leftand\right. Or, if you are certain you never want those spaces, load themleftrightpackage and issue the instruction\mleftright: That way,\leftand\rightwill behave like\mleftand\mrightthroughout the document. – Mico Aug 13 '15 at 11:34\left(x+y=z\right)\!., the space between the right paren and the subsequent period definitely does shrink. – Steven B. Segletes Aug 13 '15 at 11:34\leftand\rightin the preamble and use them. It works for me. Another way to correct the spacing is using\DeclarePairedDelimiterofmathtoolspackage. – Merzong Aug 13 '15 at 11:41\mright)and\mleft(instead of\right)and\left(then it does not work for me. If you mean that I keep them as\left(and\right)then it also does not work. I will edit my question with a better example. – Beyond-formulas Aug 13 '15 at 12:11mleftrightpackage, issue the instruction\usepackage{mleftright}in the preamble. – Mico Aug 13 '15 at 12:38mleftrightpackage (in the preamble), you should write\mleftand\mright(in the body of the document) instead of\leftand\rightto avoid getting the occasional extra spacing around the fence symbols. – Mico Aug 13 '15 at 13:22\right.and\left.too. I am sensing that this does not apply in my case, isn't it? – Beyond-formulas Aug 13 '15 at 13:29\documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{mleftright} \begin{document} \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} 4x+y-z =& \mleft( \int_3^7 dr+ \right. \ & \left. y+x\mathcal{M} \mright). \end{aligned} \end{equation} \end{document}
– Beyond-formulas Aug 13 '15 at 13:44\mleftwith\rightand\leftwith\mright? Either use one type of instructions or the other, but don't mix them up. – Mico Aug 13 '15 at 14:02\left.by\mleft,\right.by\mright.,\left(by\mleft(and\right)by\mright)as you suggested but with no result :(... – Beyond-formulas Aug 15 '15 at 13:00\mleftand\mright? Is it the vertical size of the fences across the two rows that's unsatisfactory? Did the answer Heiko gave to your follow-up posting help at all? – Mico Aug 15 '15 at 14:22