50

This is my code.. I want to left align the statement "number when majority of the nodes.....". Please help

\begin{table}[h!]
\caption{Main Notations}
\label{tab:table1}
\resizebox{9cm}{!}
{
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|p{1cm|}}
\hline
\textbf{Notation} & \textbf{Meaning} \\
\hline
$Pmd$ & local probability of misdetection \\
\hline
$P_{d}$ & local probability of detection \\
\hline
$Pfa$ & probability of false alarm \\
\hline
$Ppu$ & signal \\
\hline
$P_b$ & broadcast \\
\hline
$N_{gd}$ & node 1  \\
\hline
$N_{ln}$ & Total number of node \\
\hline
$h_{gd1}$ & \makecell{h number when majority of the nodes \\ in a topology gives a decision `1' when PU is present} \\ 
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table}
roshni
  • 859
  • Please post working examples, not just fragments -- and please consider to accept answers to your other questions as well upvoting them ;-) This shows that you appreciate the work of other users here willing to help you! –  Dec 04 '15 at 17:55

4 Answers4

75

You just have to write \makecell[l]{…} if you want to left-align (it is vertically and horizontally centred by default).

However, rather than using \resizebox I would suggest one of these two solutions, based on \tabularx and cellspace (for some vertical padding between rows). Makecell is not necessary. Also I loaded caption for a better vertical spacing between caption and table:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{array, tabularx, caption, boldline}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{cellspace}
\setlength\cellspacetoplimit{4pt}
\setlength\cellspacebottomlimit{4pt}

\begin{document}

\begin{table}[h!]
  \caption{Main Notations}
  \label{tab:table1}\centering
  \begin{tabularx}{9cm}{|Sl|X|}
    \hline
    \textbf{Notation} & \textbf{Meaning} \\
    \hline
    $P_{md}$ & local probability of misdetection \\
    \hline
    $P_{d}$ & local probability of detection \\
    \hline
    $P_{fa}$ & probability of false alarm \\
    \hline
    $P_{pu}$ & signal \\
    \hline
    $P_b$ & broadcast \\
    \hline
    $N_{gd}$ & node 1 \\
    \hline
    $N_{ln}$ & Total number of node \\
    \hline
    $h_{gd1}$ & {h number when majority of the nodes in a topology gives a decision `1' when PU is present} \\
    \hline
  \end{tabularx}
\end{table}

\begin{table}[h!]
  \caption{Main Notations}
  \label{tab:table2}\centering
  \begin{tabularx}{9cm}{SlV{2}X}
    \textbf{Notation} & \textbf{Meaning} \\
    \hlineB{1.2}
    $P_{md}$ & local probability of misdetection \\
    $P_{d}$ & local probability of detection \\
    $P_{fa}$ & probability of false alarm \\
    $P_{pu}$ & signal \\
    $P_b$ & broadcast \\
    $N_{gd}$ & node 1 \\
    $N_{ln}$ & Total number of node \\
    $h_{gd1}$ & {h number when majority of the nodes in a topology gives a decision `1' when PU is present}
  \end{tabularx}
\end{table}

\end{document} 

enter image description here

Bernard
  • 271,350
5

I would like to suggest that you go for a table with an "open" look, by getting rid of all vertical rules, most horizontal rules, and using the rule-drawing macros of the booktabs package -- \toprule, \midrule, and \bottomrule -- for the remaining horizontal lines. Rather than using \resizebox to achieve a table width of 9cm, I suggest you use a tabularx environment, whose overall width can be set to the desired width (here: 9cm) directly.

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{tabularx,booktabs,caption,ragged2e}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}X}

\begin{document}

\begin{table}[h!]
\centering
\caption{Main Notations}
\label{tab:table1}
\begin{tabularx}{9cm}{@{} lY @{}}
\toprule
\textbf{Notation} & \textbf{Meaning} \\
\midrule
$P_{md}$ & local probability of misdetection \\
$P_{d}$  & local probability of detection \\
$P_{fa}$ & probability of false alarm \\
$P_{pu}$ & signal \\
$P_b$    & broadcast \\
$N_{gd}$ & node 1  \\
$N_{ln}$ & Total number of nodes \\
$h_{gd1}$& $h$ number when majority of nodes in a topology 
           gives decision ``1'' when PU is present \\ 
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}

\end{document}
Mico
  • 506,678
0

This is copied from the documentation of the makecell package and it worked fine for me. An example for text aligning for all possibilities.

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
Cell text & 28--31\\
\hline
\makecell{Multilined \\ cell text} & 28--31\\
\hline
\makecell[l]{Left aligned \\ cell text} & 37--43\\
\hline
\makecell*[r]{Right aligned \\ cell text} & 37--43\\
\hline
\makecell[b]{Bottom aligned \\ cell text} & 52--58\\
\hline
\makecell*[{{p{3cm}}}]{Cell long text with predefined width} & 52--58\\
\hline
\makecell[{{>{\parindent1em}p{3cm}}}]{Cell long...} & 52--58\\
\hline
\end{tabular}

thomkell
  • 101
  • 3
0

Today, when is available package tabularray (version 2022A), this table can be written with the following simple code without use of the makecell package:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[skip=1ex]{caption}
\usepackage{tabularray}
\UseTblrLibrary{booktabs}

\begin{document} \begin{table}[ht] \caption{Main Notations} \label{tab:table1}\centering \begin{tblr}{hlines, vlines, colspec = {Q[l, mode=math] X[j]}, row{1} = {font=\bfseries, mode=text} } Notation & Meaning \ % P_{md} & local probability of misdetection \ P_{d} & local probability of detection \ P_{fa} & probability of false alarm \ P_{pu} & signal \ P_b & broadcast \ N_{gd} & node 1 \ N_{ln} & Total number of node \ h_{gd1} & h number when majority of the nodes in a topology gives a decision `1' when PU is present \ \end{tblr} \end{table}

or more "open look" (as usual say @Mico): \begin{table}[ht] \caption{Main Notations} \label{tab:table1}\centering \begin{tblr}{colspec = {Q[l, mode=math] X[l]}, row{1} = {font=\bfseries, mode=text} } \toprule Notation & Meaning \ \midrule P_{md} & local probability of misdetection \ P_{d} & local probability of detection \ P_{fa} & probability of false alarm \ P_{pu} & signal \ P_b & broadcast \ N_{gd} & node 1 \ N_{ln} & Total number of node \ h_{gd1} & h number when majority of the nodes in a topology gives a decision `1' when PU is present \ \bottomrule \end{tblr} \end{table} \end{document}

enter image description here

Zarko
  • 296,517