Is it possible to get hyperref hyperlinks on a 2nd bibliography with the multibib package and the amsplain BibTeX style?
Example:
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{multibib}
\newcites{two}{More Information}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{hyperindex,colorlinks, citecolor=red}
\begin{filecontents}{main.bib}
@article{Archimedes200,author = {Archimedes},title = {Pi's the limit },
journal = {Rome J. Gastronomical Math.}, year = {200BCE},volume = {10},pages={\textsc{CCCXV}--\textsc{CCCXIV}}}
@article{EulerE1776,Author = {Euler, Leonhard},Title = {All about E},
Journal = {Popular Math.},Year = {1776},Volume = {4},pages={1--2718}}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{second.bib}
@book{BourbakiSets1970,Author={Bourbaki, Nicolas},Title={Th{\'e}orie des ensembles},
Year={1970},Publisher={Hermann},Location={Paris}}
\end{filecontents}
\makeindex
\begin{document}
Archimedes~\cite{Archimedes200} and Euler~\cite{EulerE1776} studied the constants, $\pi$ and $e$, respectively.
Bourbaki~\citetwo{BourbakiSets1970} treats set theory axiomatically.
\bibliographystyle{amsplain}
\bibliography{main}
\bibliographystyletwo{amsplain}
\bibliographytwo{second}
\end{document}
Other posts propose solving this either by using natbib (e.g., multibib - hyperref doesn't work for my second bibliography) or biblatex (e.g., Problem in combining hyperref with multibib).
However, I am wedded to the amsplain bibtex style, which does not seem to be available with either natbib or biblatex.
Is there some workaround? Even hacks to hyperref or multibib would be OK (although, of course, not preferable).
Partial solution
Following the helpful suggestions by @jon, the following modified source does use biblatex to create two bibliographies, with hyperlinks to each from hyperref. The two bibliographies are independent, as I want; and no mods are needed in the source .bib files. I have not yet tackled the issue of modifying the bib style so as to resemble amsplain.
However, the 2nd printed bibliography resets the counter at 1, despite my attempt to manually reset it.
Is there a way to continue numbering in the 2nd bibliography after where the numbering in the 1st bibliography ends?
\documentclass[12pt]{memoir}
\usepackage[style=numeric,backend=bibtex]{biblatex}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{hyperindex,colorlinks, citecolor=red}
\begin{filecontents}{main.bib}
@article{Archimedes200,author = {Archimedes},title = {Pi's the limit },
journal = {Syracuse J. Gastronom.\ Math.}, year = {200BCE},volume = {10},pages={\textsc{CCCXV}--\textsc{CCCXIV}}}
@article{EulerE1776,Author = {Euler, Leonhard},Title = {All about E},
Journal = {Math.\ Psychol.},Year = {1776},Volume = {4},pages={1--2718}}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{two.bib}
@book{BourbakiSets1970,Author={Bourbaki, Nicolas},Title={Th{\'e}orie des ensembles},
Year={1970},Publisher={Hermann},place={Paris}}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{main.bib}
\addbibresource{two.bib}
\begin{document}
Archimedes~\cite{Archimedes200} and Euler~\cite{EulerE1776} studied the constants, $\pi$ and $e$, respectively.
\printbibliography % main
\newrefsection
\defbibnote{readprenote}{Here are some suggested readings.}
\printbibliography[title={Additional Readings},resetnumbers=3,prenote=readprenote] % two
Bourbaki~\cite{BourbakiSets1970} treats set theory axiomatically.
\end{document}
Fix for 2nd bibliography numbering
Using the refsegment environment from biblatex, instead of \newrefsection, and adding the defernumbers=true option when loading biblatex, seems to fix the numbering problem: by default, numbering of the 2nd bibliography resumes with the next number after the last number in the 1st bibliography.
Here's the complete source again but with that modification:
\documentclass[12pt]{memoir}
\usepackage[style=numeric,backend=bibtex,defernumbers=true]{biblatex}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{hyperindex,colorlinks, citecolor=red}
\begin{filecontents}{main.bib}
@article{Archimedes200,author = {Archimedes},title = {Pi's the limit },
journal = {Syracuse J. Gastronom.\ Math.}, year = {200BCE},volume = {10},pages={\textsc{CCCXV}--\textsc{CCCXIV}}}
@article{EulerE1776,Author = {Euler, Leonhard},Title = {All about E},
Journal = {Math.\ Psychol.},Year = {1776},Volume = {4},pages={1--2718}}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{two.bib}
@book{BourbakiSets1970,Author={Bourbaki, Nicolas},Title={Th{\'e}orie des ensembles},
Year={1970},Publisher={Hermann},place={Paris}}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{main.bib}
\addbibresource{two.bib}
\begin{document}
\begin{refsegment}
Archimedes~\cite{Archimedes200} and Euler~\cite{EulerE1776} studied the constants, $\pi$ and $e$, respectively.
\end{refsegment}
\printbibliography[segment=1] % main
\defbibnote{readprenote}{Here are some suggested readings.}
\printbibliography[title={Additional Readings},prenote=readprenote,segment=2]
\begin{refsegment}
Bourbaki~\cite{BourbakiSets1970} treats set theory axiomatically.
\end{refsegment}
\end{document}
Notice that this works even though the citations to the 2nd bibliography appear after it is printed.
multibibbe what you needed to hack? What else would you hope happen? (And I'm not saying it's easy -- especially for first-timers -- to build or mimic a citation/bibliography style forbiblatex, but it is designed so that people can do this.) – jon Oct 11 '16 at 02:44amsplainbib style would be difficult. – murray Oct 11 '16 at 13:50.bstis not easier than creating a whole.bbx/.cbx, but I'm not sure that hackingmultibib's\newcite's mechanism forhyperrefsupport will be particularly easy. My guess is that it would be hard. There is the standardbiblatexstylenumeric, which shouldn't be too hard to modify to matchamsplainsince thenumericstyle is a near analogue of BibTeX'splainstyle (I believe). – jon Oct 11 '16 at 17:45biblatexseems to be quite difficult to use, given that: I have two different.bibfiles, and my workflow, which is totally automated by TeXShop'spdflatexmkengine (and no direct command-line work). At least withmultibibthere was no processing issue there -- although of course thehyperreflinks were missing to the 2nd bibliography. – murray Oct 11 '16 at 19:17biblatex.pdfI still don't understand how to create the two bibliographies such as shown in my sample document -- without modifying my preexisting.bibfiles (which for the real document, not the minimal sample I posted here) are lengthy. – murray Oct 11 '16 at 19:19biblatex. It really depends on your use-case as to which method is best. Here's a simple one: http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/35779/8528. I'm also fairly certain that TeXShop's "pdflatexmkengine" is just thelatexmkscript, which can be easily customized. But I've never used the program. Does this answer help: http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/41970/8528? – jon Oct 11 '16 at 20:07defernumbersoption is for? – jon Oct 11 '16 at 21:18defernumbers=truewhen loadingbiblatex, then when the 2nd bibliography is about to be printed I get error: `l.34 ...{Additional Readings},prenote=readprenote]`
– murray Oct 11 '16 at 21:42biblatexversion 3.6), I do not get an error, and[3]is hyperlinked. – jon Oct 12 '16 at 00:59biblatexversion 3.6 and do get that error if in preamble I load the package with optionsstyle=numeric,backend=bibtex,defernumbers=trueand in the body of document precede\printbibliographywith\newrefsection. No error is I userefsegmentenvironments, and optionsegment=...option in\printbibliography(and, as desired, numbering resumes for 2nd segment where it ended in 1st segment). – murray Oct 13 '16 at 16:02