Some alignment issues in the align environment

Question

I have searched along in this site and in other places and I am left with some questions.

So here is my code :

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\begin{document}
\begin{align*}
\left( \dfrac{d^2\overrightarrow{OM}}{dt^2} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A}
    &= \left( \dfrac{d^2\overrightarrow{OO'}}{dt^2} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A} +\left( \dfrac{d^2\overrightarrow{O'M}}{dt^2} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A} \\
    &= \overrightarrow{a_a}(O') + \left( \dfrac{d^2}{dt^2}  \left( x' \overrightarrow{u'_x}+y' \overrightarrow{u'_y}+z' \overrightarrow{u'_z} \right)  \right) \\
    &= \overrightarrow{a_a}(O') + x'\left( \dfrac{d^2 \overrightarrow{u'_x} }{dt^2} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A}+ 2 \dot{x} \left( \dfrac{d \overrightarrow{u'_x} }{dt} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A} + \ddot{x}'\overrightarrow{u'_x} \\
    &\mathrel{\hphantom{= \overrightarrow{a_a}(O') }} +\, y'\left( \dfrac{d^2 \overrightarrow{u'_y} }{dt^2} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A}+ 2 \dot{y} \left( \dfrac{d \overrightarrow{u'_y} }{dt} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A} + \ddot{y}'\overrightarrow{u'_y} \\
    & \mathrel{\hphantom{= \overrightarrow{a_a}(O') }} +\, z'\left( \dfrac{d^2 \overrightarrow{u'_z} }{dt^2} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A}+ 2 \dot{z} \left( \dfrac{d \overrightarrow{u'_z} }{dt} \right)_{\mathcal{R}_A} + \ddot{z}'\overrightarrow{u'_z} 
\end{align*}
\end{document}

And here is my result with some painted lines

So I have some questions about alignment that turn around the point that with the \mathrel{\hphantom}, I somewhat managed to align my first + '(although it seems there is a tiny misalignment, if someone has a suggestion I am happy with it), but the next terms nevertheless do not align themselves. Why is that so ? And it seems worst for my third line, that seems it self not to be aligned with the second one. Among these lines, why did I have to add a \, after my first displayed + of the lines, although it is already taken into account in the first line ?

the reason for the misalignment is the very slight difference in width of the x, y, and z. the answers with align[ed]at* are the best approach here. — barbara beeton, Oct 28 '16 at 15:02
I had thought about that, but the result I obtain would mean that x is slightly wider than y, that sound very strange doesn't it ? — Anthony Martin, Oct 28 '16 at 21:35
it wouldn't be too surprising to me to find that these letters really do have slightly different widths. i will check that tomorrow, when i can look at my copy of volume e of computers & typesetting, which contains the drawing instructions for all the cm fonts. (an alternate method of checking would be to run tftopl on the file cmmi10.tfm, to get a human-readable version of the metrics.) — barbara beeton, Oct 29 '16 at 00:55
The idea itself does not seem incredible to me, but my interrogation was more that I would believe that y would be larger than z or x, from a very naive standpoint — Anthony Martin, Oct 29 '16 at 21:39

Bernard · Accepted Answer · 2016-10-30T12:17:15.300

A solution without \hphantom, but with alignat*. I took the opportunity to improve the look of the vectors with the esvect package, and simplified the code for the derivatives with the esdiff package: it has a \diff* command, with an optional argument (the order of derivation) and $3$ mandatory arguments: the function to derive, the name of the variable and the point at which the derivative is evaluated. A similar diffp* command exists for partial derivatives.

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{mathtools, esvect}%
 \usepackage{esdiff}
\begin{document}

\begin{alignat*}{4}
 \diff*{\vv{OM}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A}
    &=\mathrlap{\diff*[2]{\vv{OO'}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A}+\diff*[2]{\vv{O'M}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A}} \\
    &=\vv{a_a}(O') & & + \mathrlap{\diff[2]{}{t} \Bigl( x' \vv{u'_x}+y' \vv{u'_y}+z' \vv{u'_z} \Bigr)} \\
    & & & + x'\diff*[2]{\vv{u'_x}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A} & & + 2 \dot{x} \diff*{\vv{u'_x} }{t}{\mathcal{R}_A} && + \ddot{x}'\vv{u'_x} \\
    & & & + y'\diff*[2]{\vv{u'_y}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A} & & + 2 \dot{y}\diff*{\vv{u'_y}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A} & &+ \ddot{y}'\vv{u'_y} \\
    & & &+ z'\diff*[2]{\vv{u'_z}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A} & & + 2 \dot{z}\diff*{\vv{u'_z}}{t}{\mathcal{R}_A} & & + \ddot{z}'\vv{u'_z}
\end{alignat*}

\end{document}

That is both great and slightly annoying, as you make me rewrite my whole code as your solution is by far better :). Thanks for the tips, these arrows are magnificent — Anthony Martin, Oct 30 '16 at 09:45

score 5 · Answer 2 · answered Oct 28 '16 at 12:43

5

Split the \hphantom, so that only the equal sign is in the \mathrel:

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}

\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{amsmath,tikz}

\begin{document}
\begin{align*}
x   &= \overrightarrow{a_a}(O') + x'\\
    &\mathrel{\hphantom{= \overrightarrow{a_a}(O') }} +\, y'\\
    &\mathrel{\hphantom{=}} \hphantom{\overrightarrow{a_a}(O')} + y'\\
    &\mathrel{\hphantom{=}} \hphantom{\overrightarrow{a_a}(O')} \tikz[overlay]\draw[red](6pt,0)--++(0,3);+ z'
\end{align*}
\end{document}

answered Oct 28 '16 at 12:43

Ulrike Fischer

327,261

Thanks, could you elaborate a bit on why is this so, so that I can at best understand it, or at least know what to put in a \mathrel or not the next time I encounter such a thing. Additionnaly, the other + signs, are not aligned, is this 'normal' in the sens only due to differences in sizes of x, y and z ? – Anthony Martin Oct 28 '16 at 13:03
Only the equal sign is a relation symbol, so you should only put it (or its phantom) in a \mathrel. If you want to align the following plus symbols too you should use a nested aligned or alignedat as suggested by campa, doing it with \hphantom would be rather painful. – Ulrike Fischer Oct 28 '16 at 13:07

Some alignment issues in the align environment

2 Answers2