An age old issue of the extra leading \, white space in aligned was solved in the Nov.5th 2016 release.
I don't know if the following is related, but ....
why are the
alignedblocks misaligned only for self-defined symbols when the ampersand are placed differently within?
Is this something basic that I'm missing?
In the image below, the align block tagged (1) has an extra negative white space \! compared with the block tagged (4) or just equations (2) and (3).
There's no such problem when the leading symbol is an ordinary letter and not DeclareMathOperator, and I have found the same problem with newcommand*. See equation (5) ~ (8) or directly use \mathbb{E} instead of \E.
The situation is the same When the outer environment is flalign or alignat. (codes not included in this post)
I'd like to know if I must manually insert a \, for self-defined symbols. Thank you.
\documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb}
\DeclareMathOperator{\E}{ \mathbb{E} }
\begin{document}
\begin{align}
&\begin{aligned}[t]
\E &= L \\
\E &= \E
\end{aligned} \\
&\E = L \\
&\E = \E \\
&\begin{aligned}[t]
&\E = L \\
&\E = \E
\end{aligned} \\
&\begin{aligned}[t]
L &= L \\
L &= \E
\end{aligned} \\
&L = L \\
&L = \E \\
&\begin{aligned}[t]
&L = L \\
&L = \E
\end{aligned}
\end{align}
\end{document}

align,alignatandalignedstart with{}, so a thin space is inserted if a math operator is at the beginning of the material in such cells. It also happens with\sin, for instance. What you see is a thin space in lines 3–6, rather than negative spaces in the other lines. – egreg Feb 20 '17 at 16:58\Eto be an operator the expected use would be like\sinwith a following argument\sin\thetathemathopspacing makes sure there is a thin space in\sin x(or\E x) in none of your examples is\Eused in that way. – David Carlisle Feb 20 '17 at 16:59