The MWE below produces the following picture:
The problem is to obtain better vertical spacing between the inline rows. The problem seems to be due to the extra heights of the sigmas. I used the spacing environment from the setspace package but that seems to also include what loks like dramatically more space before and after the list.
So my question is: is there a way to only stretch the space between the items when using the inline option of enumitem?
Note: The tabbedenum environment was from this answer.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
\usepackage{tabto}
\newenvironment{tabbedenum}[2][]
{\NumTabs{#2}\begin{enumerate*}[
before={\unskip\hspace{\dimexpr-\parindent-1pt}\tab},itemjoin={\tab},#1]}%
{\end{enumerate*}}
\usepackage{setspace}
\begin{document}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Some text.
\begin{spacing}{3}
\begin{tabbedenum}{2}
\item $\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}x_r + \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}y_r = \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}(x_r+y_r)?$
\item $\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}x_r \cdot \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}y_r = \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}(x_r\cdot y_r)?$
\item $\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}(c\cdot x_r) = \displaystyle c\cdot\sum_{r=1}^{n}x_r?$
\item $\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}x_r + \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}y_r = \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}(x_r+y_r)?$
\end{tabbedenum}
\end{spacing}
\item Some text.
\end{enumerate}
\end{document}




\spacing{3}seems huge! Your result looks fine for me. Another solution would be to use thetaskspackage, which has anafter-item-skipkey for that. – Bernard Oct 03 '17 at 19:31