2

I just switched to Libertinus Math and now have a problem with an \underbrace! While using Latin Modern as math font I get the expected result:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage[
    math-style=ISO,
    bold-style=ISO,
    partial=upright,
    nabla=upright
]{unicode-math}
\usepackage{libertine}
%\setmathfont{Libertinus Math}
\usepackage{microtype}
\begin{document}
FAT-16: \[\underbrace{\text{16-Bit}}_{\mathclap{\text{Größe einer Adresse (für das Speichern der Dateien)}}}\text{-Dateisystem}\]

\end{document}

mwe pic 1

After switching to Libertinus Math the \underbrace has a wrong size:

mwe pic 2

Any idea how to fix it?

(ed.) minimal example

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\setmathfont{Libertinus Math}
\begin{document}
\[\underbrace{z}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzzzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzzzzz}_{a}\]
\end{document}
% Local Variables:
% TeX-engine: luatex
% End:

enter image description here

Surprisingly, xelatex exhibits different output which fails less often:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\setmathfont{Libertinus Math}
\begin{document}
\[\underbrace{z}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzzzz}_{a}\]
\[\underbrace{zzzzzzz}_{a}\]
\end{document}
% Local Variables:
% TeX-engine: xetex
% End:

enter image description here

Here is using with the Libertinus as in TeXLive 2018 current pretest, updated. Things are much better but still a bit strange for zzz. In images below, maybe I have one more lines, because I extended mwe in the meantime.

With xetex at left and luatex at right:

enter image description hereenter image description here

Josef
  • 7,432
  • I have added more minimal example. There is also a problem with xelatex.... (I thought at first only lualatex) –  Mar 25 '18 at 12:17
  • 1
    works okay for me with the newest version of the font (in texlive 2018). – Ulrike Fischer Mar 25 '18 at 12:21
  • Works for me too (xelatex and lualatex) – Christoph90 Mar 25 '18 at 12:31
  • @UlrikeFischer confirmed on my updated TeXLive 2018. Strange line spacing discrepancy between xetex and luatex output (luatex's one is less spread out) –  Mar 25 '18 at 12:37
  • @Josef I hope you don't mind all my edits to your post. –  Mar 25 '18 at 12:43
  • side note: It looks as if underbrace width can increase only step-wise, explaining sort of that some cases such as zzz look sub-optimal. Loading or not mathtools changes nothing. –  Mar 25 '18 at 12:45
  • @jfbu No, as long as you solve my problem! ;-) I can confirm the massive difference between xelatex and lualatex with TL2017 – Josef Mar 25 '18 at 12:45
  • 1
    thus as first pointed by @UlrikeFischer it looks as if you only need latest Libertinus update. The images at bottom were taken with compilation using updated TL2018 pretest. –  Mar 25 '18 at 12:47
  • @jfbu My plan was to install TL2018 pretest in my Easter holidays anyway. So at least my problem seems to vanish next week! ;-) – Josef Mar 25 '18 at 12:49

1 Answers1

2

(moved from comments)

The issue seems non-existent with latest Libertinus Math release, as currently available in TeXLive 2018 (pretest, libertinus texlive package having rev number 47077).

The version seems to be Version 6.5 from FontBook info field (Mac OS). And from the CTAN annoucement Version: 6.5 2018-03-21