1

I try to write something like:

\[
\bigcup_{\gamma<\omega*2}\mathcal{T}_{\gamma}|_{\aleph _0}
\]

But it can not display $\gamma<\omega*2$ underneath \bigcup in TeXstudio. What is the problem?

Here is the whole file in TeXstudio.

\documentclass[preview,border=3pt,3pt]{standalone}

\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,backgrounds}
\usetikzlibrary{calc}
\usetikzlibrary{decorations.shapes}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta}
\tikzset{decorate sep/.style 2 args=
    {decorate,decoration={shape backgrounds,shape=circle,shape size=#1,shape sep=#2}}}
\tikzset{>={Latex[width=1.5mm,length=3mm]}}

\begin{document}
    \begin{tikzpicture}
    \tikzstyle{line} = [fill=white, line width=.3pt]
    \tikzstyle{gray1} = [fill=gray!5,fill opacity=0.5]
    \tikzstyle{gray2} = [fill=gray!20,fill opacity=0.5]
    \tikzstyle{blue1} = [fill=blue!10,fill opacity=0.5]
    \tikzstyle{blue2} = [fill=blue!20,fill opacity=0.5]


    \filldraw[gray2](0, 9)--(-1.67,6.5)--(-1.33,4)--(5.33,4)--(7,9);   
    \filldraw[blue1](-3, 9)--(-1.33,4)--(-2,9);   
    \filldraw[blue2](-2, 9)--(-1.67,6.5)--(0,9);   

        \node[above] at (-1.2,8.3) {$\bigcup_{\gamma<\omega*2}\mathcal{T}_{\gamma}|_{\aleph _{0}}$};

    \end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
Torbjørn T.
  • 206,688
  • 1
    \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \[ \bigcup_{\gamma<\omega*2}\mathcal{T}_{\gamma}|_{\aleph _0} \] \end{document} works fine here, can you show a complete example? – Torbjørn T. Mar 25 '18 at 21:47
  • @Torbjørn T, I add file and please take a look at. Thanks. – Eugene Zhang Mar 25 '18 at 21:53
  • That's using inline math, in your original example you used displayed math. Add a \displaystyle after the opening $, or use \bigcup\limits. See https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/32824/ to learn more about this. – Torbjørn T. Mar 25 '18 at 21:55
  • 1
    \bigcup is like \sum and uses the limits form with the subscript underneath in display math and the subscript form in inline math. It is possible to overrulethis and force it to use the limits style but that negates most of the design of inline math so make sure you really want to do that. It is probably better to use display math. – David Carlisle Mar 25 '18 at 22:03

0 Answers0