I am using this template to write my thesis. The template uses Natlib for references, whereas I really need Biblatex.
When I simply try to change \usepackage[natbib] for biblatex I get the error message
This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2016/Debian)
Capacity: max_strings=100000, hash_size=100000, hash_prime=85009
The top-level auxiliary file: aagot-1-report.aux
The style file: acm.bst
Illegal, another \bibstyle command---line 80 of file aagot-1-report.aux
: \bibstyle
: {acm}
I'm skipping whatever remains of this command
Database file #1: Mendeleytry.bib.bib
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for ""
You've used 14 entries,code here
The solution
\usepackage[backend=bibtex, natbib=true, style=numeric]{biblatex}
didn't work.
Another possible solution was said to be to recompile from scratch to delete the .aux file, but that resulted in
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/biblatex.sty:462:
LaTeX Error:
Command \bibhang already defined.
Or name \end... illegal, see p.192 of the manual.
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.462 \newlength{\bibhang}
I have tried to use this "marco" to override the \requirePackage settings, but that also didn't work and resulted into
LaTeX Error: Two \documentclass or \documentstyle comm
ands.
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.45 \documentclass[whitelogo]{
tudelft-report}
Where I can't seem to delete any of the document classes without getting the functionality of the tudelft-package and the biblatex citing (or in fact getting it to work at all!)
(no line number):
[0] Config.pm:343> INFO - This is Biber 2.5
[0] Config.pm:346> INFO - Logfile is 'aagot-1-report.blg'
[62] biber:290> INFO - === Tue Apr 24, 2018, 22:24:06
[246] Utils.pm:165> ERROR - aagot-1-report.bcf is malformed, last biblatex
run probably failed. Deleted aagot-1-report.bbl
[246] Biber.pm:113> INFO - ERRORS: 1
Is there any way I can still make this template work with Biblatex? Natlib seems to deeply rooted in the file and I don't know how to change it/access the settings/the ".sty"-file. Can I use the example documentclass combined with biblatex (instead of the standard natbib) without losing the great parts of the rest of the document class?
Thanks very much :)
backend=bibtexin which case you can not usebiberso it is unsurprising that your last fragment showsbibererrors. – David Carlisle Apr 24 '18 at 22:36\bibliographystyle{...},\bibliography{...}and add\addbibresource{....bib}to your preamble. – samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Apr 24 '18 at 22:37natbib, you should expect conflict withbiblatex. Did you choose this template, or is it something you have to use as a requirement? – gusbrs Apr 24 '18 at 22:41